期刊文献+

一种基于“交并集”和Pignistic概率的证据冲突的改进方法 被引量:1

A New Solution Based on “Conjunctive & Disjunctive Pooling” and Pignistic Probability Transforms According to the Evidence Conflict Problems in D-S Theory of Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对D-S证据理论无法解决高冲突证据的缺陷,通过对现有几种证据冲突的改进方法进行分析,提出了基于“交并集”和Pignistic概率的改进方法。本文放宽D-S组合规则的假设,只要求证据在组合时至少有一条是真实的,如果证据A和B相互支持,说明它们都是真实的,可以用“交集”运算将证据的信度聚焦在它们的交集上;如果证据A和B相互冲突,表明不知道哪一条证据是真实的,则用“并集”运算将信度聚焦在它们的并集上,即证据支持A或B中的一个,这种思路更符合人类的直觉。由于在目标识别系统中,最终决策是单个待识目标,因此以还要用Pignistic概率转换法将多元素命题的BPA再分配给它的各个组合元素,最后,信度最高的元素作为结果进行输出。实验表明,本文方法在解决证据冲突方面较其他方法拥有明显的优势。使用本文方法时,证据的融合顺序对融合结果没有影响,因此可以很方便地编程实现。 According to the defect that in the D-S Theory of Evidence, the evidence combination rules can't work correctly facing high conflicting evidences, a new solution based on "conjunctive & disjunctive pooling" and Pignistic probability transforms is introduced. The solution supposes that at least one evidence is true among all the given evidences. When evidence A and B are consistent which means both the evidences are true, the beliefs of evidences will focus on their conjunctive pooling. On the other hand, when evidence A and B are inconsistent which means can't judgewhich evidence is true, the beliefs of evidences will focus on their disjunctive pooling. In object recognition systems, owing to the request of single final output, a pignistic probability transform is used to reassign the basic probability assignments of multi-element propositions to each element thus the final output is the one with the highest belief. The experiment results show that the solution can get best performance evaluation. Finally, the sequence of evidence fusion has no effect on fusion results so the solution can be programmed easily.
出处 《计算机科学》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期148-152,共5页 Computer Science
基金 国家863高技术研究发展计划项目(编号:2003AA114020)
关键词 证据理论 证据组合规则 证据冲突 Pignistic概率 Theory of evidence, Evidence combination rules, Evidence conflict, Pignistie probability
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Dempster A.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multivalued mapping.Annals of Mathematical Statistics,1967,38:325~339
  • 2Yager R R.On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rule.Information Science,1987,41:93 ~ 137
  • 3孙全,叶秀清,顾伟康.一种新的基于证据理论的合成公式[J].电子学报,2000,28(8):116-119. 被引量:440
  • 4Campos F,Cavalcante S.An extended approach for DempsterShafer theory.IEEE,2003.338~344
  • 5Smets P.The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model.IEEE Trans on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence,1990,12(5):447~458
  • 6吴根秀.冲突证据组合方法[J].计算机工程,2005,31(9):151-154. 被引量:19
  • 7Prade D D H.On the combiniation of evidence in various mathematical frameworks.Reliability Data Collection and Analysis,1992,EAFC:213~241
  • 8Ferson S,Kreinovich V.Representation,propagation,and aggregation of uncertainty:[SAND Report].[in progress],2002
  • 9向阳,史习智.证据理论合成规则的一点修正[J].上海交通大学学报,1999,33(3):357-360. 被引量:63
  • 10潘巍,王阳生,杨宏戟.Pignistic概率转换算法设计[J].计算机工程,2005,31(4):20-22. 被引量:11

二级参考文献27

  • 1肖人彬,费奇.基于证据理论的不确定性分析[J].华中理工大学学报,1993,21(3):24-30. 被引量:1
  • 2刘雷健,杨静宇.基于融合信息的物体识别[J].模式识别与人工智能,1993,6(1):27-33. 被引量:19
  • 3肖人彬,王雪.相关证据合成方法的研究[J].模式识别与人工智能,1993,6(3):227-234. 被引量:30
  • 4吴崇俭.对G·Shafer证据权理论中几个定理的修正[J].模式识别与人工智能,1995,8(2):128-135. 被引量:1
  • 5边肇祺.用于智能诊断系统的证据推理方法及进展[J].模式识别与人工智能,1988,(2):11-21.
  • 6[1]Ronald R.Yager.On the dempster-shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences,1987,41:93-137.
  • 7[2]G.Shafer.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton U.P.,Princeton,1976.
  • 8[3]A.P.Dempster.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multi-valued mapping[J].Ann.Math.Statist.1967,38:325-339.
  • 9Simth C A B.Consistency in Statistical Inference and Decision.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 1961,B23:1-37
  • 10Smets P. Constructing the Pignistic Probability Function in a Context of Uncertainty. Proc. Fifth Workshop on Uncertainty in Al, Windsor,1990:319-326

共引文献489

同被引文献15

  • 1吴根秀.冲突证据组合方法[J].计算机工程,2005,31(9):151-154. 被引量:19
  • 2Zadeh L A.Rewiev of Shfer's A mathematical of evidence[J].AI Magazine, 1984,5 : 81-86.
  • 3Yager R R.On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules[J].Information Sciences, 1991:41 : 171-197.
  • 4Smets P.The combination of evidence in the transferable belief modle [J].IEEE Transansactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1990,12(5 ) : 447-458.
  • 5Murphy C K.Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts[J]. Decision Support Systems,2000,29(1).
  • 6Sharer G.A mathematical theory of evidence[M].Princeton,NJ: Princeton University Press, 1976.
  • 7Jousselme A L,Grenier D,Boss E.A new distance between two bodies of evidence[J].Information Fusion,2001,2( 1 ) :91-101.
  • 8Dempster A P.Upper and lower probabilities induced by a multiple valued mapping[J].Ann Math Statist, 1967,38:325-339.
  • 9Smets P.Analyzing the combination of conflicting belief functions[J]. Information Fusion, 2006,7(2) : 240-244.
  • 10蒋正新 施国梁.矩阵理论及其应用[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社,1998.371-378.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部