1SATAR B, JACKLER R K, OGHALAI J, et al. Risk-benefit analysis of using the middle fossa approach for acoustic neuromas with >10mm cerebellopontine angle component [J]. Laryngoscope, 2002, 112(8 Pt 1): 1500-1506.
2BRACKMANN D E, OWENS R M, FRIEDMAN R A, et al. Prognostic factors for hearing preservation in vestibular schwannoma surgery [J]. Am J Otol, 2000, 21(3): 417-424.
3MEITELES L E, LIU J K., COULDWELL W T. Hearing restoration after resection of an intracanalicular vestibular schwannoma: a role for emergency surgery? Case report and review of the literature [J]. J Neurosurg, 2002, 9.6(4): 796- 800.
4MANGHAM C A Jr. Retrosigmoid versus middle fossa surgery for small vestibular schwannomas [J]. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114(8): 1455-1461.
5COLLETTI V, FIORINO F. Middle fossa versus retrosigmoid-transmeatal approach in vestibular schwannoma surgery: a prospective study [J]. Otol Neurotol, 2003, 24(6): 927-934.
6MAGLIULO G, PARROTTO D, STASOLLA A, et al. Modified translabyrinthine approach and hearing preservation [J]. Laryngoscope, 2004, 114(6): 1133-1138.
7JACKSON L E, ROBERSON J B Jr. Acoustic neuroma surgery: use of cochlear nerver action potential monitoring for hearing preservation [J]. Am J Otol, 2000, 21 (2): 249- 259.
8YAMAKAMI I, OKA N, YAMAURA A. Intraoperative monitoring of cochlear nerve compound action potential in cerebellopontine angle tumor removal [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2003, 10(5): 567-570.
9MOM T, TELISCHI F F, MARTIN G K, et al. Vasospasm of the internal auditory artery: significance in cerebellopontine angle surgery [J]. Am J Otol, 2000, 21(5): 735-742.
10SATAR B, YETISER S, OZKAPTAN Y. Impact of tumor size on hearing outcome and facial function with the middle fossa approach for acoustic neuroma: a meta-analytic study [J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2003, 123(4): 499-505.
