论重写《日本汉文学史》

On Re-Writing History of Chinese Literature in Japan

迄今为止,只有日本学者撰写过《日本汉文学史》,但都很不理想。不是材料太简、叙述枝蔓,就是观点偏颇,其中代表日本学者这方面最高水平的猪口笃志写的《日本汉文学史》一书也存有诸多缺点和错误。因而,都不能反映日太汉文学史的起初面貌。无论从文化交流与比较研究的需要,还是显现中国学者的不同立场,都应该重写一部由中国学者撰著的“日本汉文学史”。这部“日本汉文学史”从宗旨、纲目、分期、撰述的方法与具体材料的处理都应该提出新的独立的见解。

Hitherto only Japanese scholars have dealt with History of Chinese Literature in Japan, but they are all not so ideal for they could not reflect the original facade of it. The re-writing by Chinese scholars of a History of Chinese Literature in Japan is a must, either for the needs of cultural exchange and comparative studies, or for demonstrating a different standpoint by Chinese scholars. This new volume should put up new and independent viewpoints in its aim, scheme, periods, the ways of writing and concrete materrals,