期刊文献+

桂北元宝山地区超镁铁岩的年代、源区及其地质意义 被引量:28

Geochronology,Mantle Source and Geological Implications of Neoproterozoic Ultramafic Rocks from Yuanbaoshan Area of Northern Guangxi
下载PDF
导出
摘要 桂北元宝山地区超镁铁岩的SHRIMP锆石U-Pb年龄为(841±22)Ma(2σ),与桂北三防-何家湾地区出露的镁铁-超镁铁侵入岩年龄(约825Ma)接近,表明桂北地区出露的镁铁-超镁铁侵入岩具有基本一致的结晶年龄。超镁铁岩的岩石学和主量元素特征表明超镁铁岩是堆晶岩,其微量元素质量分数较低(〈NMORB),蛛网图上除了Nb、Ta、Zr、Hf亏损外,一般表现为平坦的分配曲线。超镁铁岩εNd(f)的变化范围为-1.0~6.5,表明超镁铁岩的母岩浆遭受了一定程度的地壳混染。元宝山地区超镁铁岩低的w(Th)/w(Nb)比值与原始地幔非常类似,而与大陆弧玄武岩浆的比值明显不同,推测元宝山地区超镁铁岩应形成于板内环境,而不是活动大陆边缘,其形成很可能与导致新元古代Rodinia超大陆裂解的发生于约825Ma的华南地幔柱有关。 SHRIMP U-Pb zircon age,geochemical and Sm, Nd isotopic results are reported for the Neoproterozoic ultramafic rocks in Yuanbaoshan area of northern Guangxi. The ultramafic rocks have a crystallization age of(841±22)Ma(2σ) gained in this paper, similar to the age about 825 Ma of mafic intrusions in Sanfang-Hejiawan area of northern Guangxi. Petrological characteristics show that ultramafic rocks have remarked olivine peritectic texture with Fo values of 78-83 in olivine. The magma, equilibrated to the olivine,may have the calculated MgO of 7.3 % at most. So the ultramafic rocks are cumulus rocks. Trace elements of these rocks are low in contents and less than NMORB. On the spidergram,the Nb,Ta, Zr and Hf are depleted but Ti is not. The spidergram has a horizontal-like pattern excepting the depletions of some HFSEs. The most incompatible element ratios have wide ranges, such as w(Nb)/w(La) (0.11 - 0.96) and w(Th)/w(Nb)(0.18-0. 57). The εNd (t) Of these rocks ranges from -1.0 to ±6.5 and most have high εNd (t). These characteristics indicate the magma of the ultramafic rocks may have undergone some crustal contamination. By comparison with simultaneous mafic-ultramafic rocks in northern Guangxi,the ultramafic rocks in Yuanbaoshan area have the highest εNd (t) and suffer the least contamination. The study has found that the mantle source of the ultramafic rocks has comparability with that of the Australia Gairdner mafic dykes (GDS), which is related to the Neoproterozoic mantle plume. For example, the εNd (t) and w(Th)/w(Nb) of them are alike and the lowest w(Th)/w(Nb) is close to that of primitive mantle. The lowest w(Th)/w(Nb), close to primi tramafic rocks should be generated wi sis of the ultramafic rocks in Yuanba tive mantle and far from the continental arc basalt implies that the ulthin a continental plate and not an arc setting. Hence, the petrogeneoshan area is possibly related to the 825 Ma mantle plume beneath South China of Rodinia.
出处 《地质科技情报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期11-18,共8页 Geological Science and Technology Information
基金 国家自然科学基金委创新研究群体科学基金项目(40421303) 中国科学院知识创新工程项目(KZCX3-SW-141)
关键词 超镁铁岩 新元古代 地球化学 地幔柱 华南 RODINIA ultramafic rock Neoproterozoic geochemistry mantle plume South China Rodinia
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1杨丽贞.桂北中元古代的科马提岩[J].中国区域地质,1990(1):14-24. 被引量:16
  • 2唐红松,肖禧砥,刘继顺.桂北四堡群中科马提岩系及其成因类型[J].矿产与地质,1992,6(2):126-138. 被引量:7
  • 3Zhou M F,Zhao T P,Malpas J. Crustal-contaminated komatiitic basalts in southern China: Products of a Proterozoic mantle plume beneath the Yangtze Block[J]. Precambrian Research, 2000,103:175- 189.
  • 4Li Z X,Zhang L H, Powell C M. South China in Rodinia: Part of the missing link between Australia East Antarctica and Laurentia[J]. Geology, 1995,23(5) :407-410.
  • 5Li Z X,Li X H,Kinny P D,et al. The breakup of Rodinia:Did it start with a mantle plume beneath South China? [J]. Earth Planet. Science Letters, 1999,173,171 - 181.
  • 6Li Z X,Li X H,Kinny P D,et al. Geochronology of Neoproterozoic syn-rift magmatism in the Yangtze Craton,South China and correlations with other continents, Evidence for a mantle superplume that broke up Rodinia[J]. Precambrian Research, 2003,122,85- 109.
  • 7Zhou J C,Wang X L,Qiu J S,et al. Geochemistry of Meso-and Neoproterozoic mafic-ultramafic rocks from northern Guangxi, China..Arc or plume magmatism? [J]. Geochemical Journal, 2004,38:139- 152.
  • 8Li X H,Li Z X,Ge W C, et al. Neoproterozoic granitoids in South Chinaz Crustal melting above a mantle plume at ca. 825 Ma? [J]. Precambrian Research, 2003,122 :45- 83.
  • 9Wang X L,Zhou J C,Qiu H S,et al. Comment on "Neoproterozoic granitoids in South China, Crustal melting above a mantle plume at ca. 825Ma?" by Xian-Hua Li et al. [Precambrian Res. 122(2003) 45 - 83] [J]. Precambrian Research, 2004, 132:401-403.
  • 10Li X H,Li Z X,Ge W C,et al. Reply to the comment: Mantle plume-, but not are-related Neoproterozoic magmatism in South China[J]. Precambrian Research, 2004,132 : 405 - 407.

二级参考文献40

共引文献200

同被引文献811

引证文献28

二级引证文献462

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部