摘要
目的:通过比较试验考察两种水分测定方法有无显著性差异。方法:应用常压干燥失重法及费休氏法进行水分测定。结果:通过试验比较,干燥失重水分测定法与费休氏水分测定法无显著性差异。结论:部分药品的水分测定可用干燥失重法代替药典规定的费休氏法。
Objective: To determine whether the two moisture measuring methods bold significant difference by comparative test. Method: To apply the loss on drying method under normal pressure and the Karl fischer reation method both. Result: According to comparison, the two testing methods bold no significant difference in result. Conclusion: For some of the drugs, we can apply the loss on drying method under normal pressure instead of the Karl fischer reaction method for moisture content testing.
出处
《黑龙江医药》
CAS
2007年第1期39-40,共2页
Heilongjiang Medicine journal
关键词
水分测定法
干燥失重水分测定法
费休氏水分测定法
moisture measuring method
loss on drying under normal pressure method
the Karl fisher reactionmethod