期刊文献+

英语使动结构的复合空间理据及其语义的再认识 被引量:4

English Caused-motion Constructions:A Conceptual Blending Perspective and Their Semantic Interpretation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语使动结构的形成从复合空间理论能得到较为完满的解释。分别源自语法空间和概念空间的信息通过映射和组合构成复合空间,产生新创结构。使动结构的语义因动词与使动结构之间关系的不同选择而存在差异。从语义扩展、动态作用力关系、交际使动及共现行为等四个方面可对其进行恰当的归类和系统的阐释,以弥补Goldberg(1995)及其他同类研究中讨论不尽全面且语义类别交叉等方面的不足,使我们重新认识使动结构的构式义。 The caused-motlon constructions can be adequately deciphered with reference to conceptual blending theory. In this case, a partial mapping of counterparts from two input spaces (grammar space and conceptual space) results in a blended space with an emergent structure. As the verbs used in caused-motion constructions vary, the constructions may differ in their semantic meanings. However, the complexity of semantic interpretation can be resolved if we examine the relations between the verbs in the constructions and the constructions themselves. The relations can be characterized respectively by elaboration, dynamic force, communicative move and co-occurring activitiy. This approach can be expected to compensate for the inadequate categorization of constructional meanings from the existent studies and provide insights for the diversified yet interrelated meanings.
作者 陆国君
出处 《解放军外国语学院学报》 北大核心 2007年第1期5-9,73,共6页 Journal of PLA University of Foreign Languages
关键词 英语 使动结构 概念复合 语义阐释 English caused-motion construction conceptual blending semantic interpretation
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1蒋勇.复合空间理论与关联理论相似的语言哲学观[J].山东外语教学,2001,22(1):1-5. 被引量:17
  • 2梁锦祥.英语的使动结构[J].外国语,2000,23(1):53-58. 被引量:6
  • 3熊学亮,梁晓波.致使结构的原型研究[J].江西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2003,36(6):106-110. 被引量:19
  • 4Croft,W.& D.Cruse.Cognitive Linguistics[M].Cambridge:CUP,2004.
  • 5Fauconnier,G.Mental Spaces[M].New York:Cambridge University Press,1994.
  • 6Fauconnier,G.Mappings in Thought and Language[M].Cambridge:CUP,1997.
  • 7Fauconnier,G.& M.Turner.Conceptual projection and middle spaces[R/OL].UCSD Cognitive Science Technical Report.(1994-04)[2006-04-03].http://www.cogsci.ucsd.edu/research/files/technical/9401.pdf.
  • 8Fauconnier,G.& M.Turner.Blending as a central process of grammar[C] // A.Goldberg,Conceptual Structure,Discourse and Language.Stanford,Calif.:CSLI Publications,1996.
  • 9Goldberg,A.Constructions:A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure[M].Chicago:University of Chicago Press,1995.
  • 10Goldberg,Adele.The relationships between verbs and constructions[C] // M.Verspoor,K.Lee & E.Sweetser.Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning.Armsterdam:John Benjamins Publishing Company,1997.

二级参考文献17

  • 1梁锦祥.论模式意义[J].外国语,1994,17(5):38-42. 被引量:1
  • 2[1]Aissen, J. 1979. The Syntax of Causative Constructions. [M] New York andLondon: Garland Publishing, INC.
  • 3[2]Bussmann,H.语言与语言学词典[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社1996.
  • 4[3]Comrie, B. 1981. Language Universals and Linguistic Typology.[M] Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • 5[4]Cresswell, M. J. 1981. Adverbs of Causation. [A] Hans-Jurgen Eikmeyer & HannesRieser. (eds.) Words, Worlds and Context:New Approaches in Word Semantics [ C ]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • 6[6]Goddard, C. 1998. Semantic Analysis----A Practical Introduction [M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 7[7]Labov, W. 1973. The boundaries of words and their meanings.[A]. InC.-J. N.Bailey & R. W. Shuy (eds.). New Ways of Analysing Variation in English. [C]. Washingtong, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • 8[8]Lakoff, G. 1970. (written in 1965) Irregularity in Syntax [M].New York: Holt, Rinhard & Winston.
  • 9[9]Langacker, R. 1990. Concept, Image and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. [M]. Berling and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 10[10]Langacker, R. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. [M].Vol. Ⅱ. Standford: Standford University Press.

共引文献39

同被引文献55

引证文献4

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部