大学生自我同一性状态与同一性风格、亲子沟通的关系被引量：65

Ego Identity Status,Identity Style and Parent-Adolescent Communication in College Students

下载PDF

导出

摘要采用问卷法对594名大学生进行调查,结果发现,大学生自我同一性状态的人数分布中,延缓状态占67.5%,其余三种同一性状态各占10%左右;大学生在四种同一性状态的人数分布上不存在年级差异和性别差异;与其他同一性状态相比,获得状态的大学生在信息风格上得分最高,早闭状态的大学生在规范风格上得分最高,扩散状态的大学生在扩散风格上得分最高;亲子沟通中的开放性和问题既对同一性状态有直接预测作用,又以三种同一性风格为中介间接影响同一性状态。 594 college students were investigated using the revised Extend Objective Measure of Ego Identity Status-2, Identity Style Inventory-3 and Parent-Adolescent Communication Scale. The results indicated as follows：（1） college students in the moratorium status were 67.5 per cent, and students in the other three statuses were about 10 per cent, respectively; （2） no grade differences and gender differences were found on the distribution of four identity statuses; （3） in contrast with students in the other three statuses, college students in the achievement status scored higher in the informational style, forelosures scored higher in the normative style, and diffusions scored higher in the diffuse style; （4） openness and problem in parent-adolescent communication had both direct and indirect influences on the identity statuses. Indirect influences were moderated by the identity styles.

作者王树青张文新张玲玲

机构地区北京师范大学发展心理研究所山东师范大学心理学院

出处《心理发展与教育》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期59-65,共7页 Psychological Development and Education

关键词自我同一性自我同一性状态同一性风格亲子沟通 ego identity ego identity status identity style parent-adolescent communication

分类号 B844.2 [哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献16

1Erikson E.Identity:Youth and crisis.New York:Norton,1968.
2Marcia J E.Development and validation of ego identity status.Journal of personality and social psychology,1966,3:215-223.
3Berzonsky M D.Self-construction over the life span:A process perspective on identity formation.In G.J.Neimeyer & R.A.Neimeyer (Eds.),Advances in personal construct psychology (Vol.1,pp.155-186).Greenwich,CT:JAI Press,1990.
4Berzonsky M D.Identity style and coping strategies.Journal of Personality,1992,60,771-788.
5Waterman A.Identity development from adolescence to adulthood:An extension of theory and a review of research.Developmental Psychology,1982,18,341-358.
6Cramer P.Freshman to senior year:A follow-up of identity,narcissism,and defense mechanisms.Journal of Research in Personality,1998,32:156-172.
7Kroger J.Gender and identity:The intersection of structure,content and context.Gender Roles,1997,36(11/12):747-770.
8Archer S L.A feminist's approach to identity.In G.R.Adams,T.P.Gullotta,& R.Montemayor (Eds.) Adolescent identity formation (pp.25-49).Newbury Park,CA:Sage Publications,1992.
9Barnes H L,Olson D H.Parent-adolescent communication scale.In D.H.Olson et al.,Famlily inventories:Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle (pp.33-48).St.Paul:Famliy Social Science,University of Minnesota,1982.
10Grotevant H D,Cooper C R.Individuation in family relationships:A perspective on individual differences in the development of identity and role-taking skill in adolescence.Human Development,1986,29,82-100.

二级参考文献7

1Erikson E.Identity:Youth and crisis.New York:Norton,1968
2Marcia J.Developmental and validation of ego identity status.Journal of personality and social psychology,1966,3:551-558
3Bennion LD,Adams GR.A revision of the extended objective measure of ego-identity status:An identity instrument for use with late adolescents.Journal of Adolescent Research,1986,1:183-198
4Marcia JE.The status of the statuses:Research review.In JE Marcia,AS Waterman,DR Matteson,SL Archer,and JL Orlofsky,Ego Identity:A handbook for psychosocial research.New York:Springer-Verlag,1993,22-41
5Matos PM,Barbosa S,Almeida HM,Costa ME.Parental attachment and identity in Portuguese late adolescents.Journal of Adolescence,1999,22:805-818
6Erikson E.Identity:Youth and crisis.New York:Norton,1968.
7Berzonsky M D.Identity style inventory(ISI3):Revised version.Unpublished measure,State University of New York,1992.