期刊文献+

混和方法研究——美国教育研究方法的一种新范式 被引量:36

Mixed Method Research:A New Paradigm in American Education Research Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 混和方法研究是指研究者在同一研究中综合调配或混合定量和质性研究的技术、方法、手段、概念或语言的研究类别;它是在美国质性——定量两种研究方法范式的争论中产生的;其理论基础是实用主义;混合方法研究程序设计包括确定研究问题、研究目标、选择研究方法、收集资料、分析资料、解释资料、合法化、得出结论并撰写最终报告等8个步骤;它的突出优势是在研究中能增加交叉性优势和压缩非重叠性弱势,提高研究的效度与信度。 The mixed methods research is a type of research where researcher mixes or combines quantitative and qualitative research techniques, approaches, concepts or language into a single study. It came into being in the "war paradigm" between qualitative and quantitative research paradigm in American. Its theory foundation is pragmatism. It comprises eight procedures:determining the research question, determining purpose of mixed research, selecting research methodology, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, legitimating, and conclusion drawing/final report. Its striking strengths include increasing complementary strengths and decreasing non-overlapping weaknesses in research and enforce the validity and trustworthiness of research.
作者 田虎伟
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期12-17,共6页 International and Comparative Education
关键词 定量研究方法范式 质性研究方法范式 混合方法研究 mixed method research qualitative research paradigm quantitative research paradigm
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Viadero,Debra.(2005).'Mixed Methods' Research Examined Researchers See Pros and Cons of 'Mixed Methods' Studies.Education Week.24,(20),2005-1-26.p20.
  • 2Johnson,R.B.,& Onwuegbuzie,A.J.(2004).Mixed Methods Research:A Research Paradigm whose Time has Come.Educational Researcher,33,(7):p12-26.
  • 3邓猛,潘剑芳.论教育研究中的混合方法设计[J].教育研究与实验,2002(3):56-61. 被引量:25
  • 4Howe,K.R.(1992).Against the Quantitative-Qualitative Incompatibility Thesis,or,Dogmas Die Hard.Education Researcher,17,(1):10-16.
  • 5Onwuegbuzie,A.J.,& Teddlie.C,(2003).A Framework for Analyzing Data in Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research.Thousand Oak,CA:Sage.p.351-383.
  • 6Greene,J.C.,Caracelli,v.j,& Graham,W.F,(1989).Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-method Evaluation Design.Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis,11 (2):p255-274.
  • 7Sechrest,L.,Sidana,S.(1995).Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods:Is there an Alternative ? Evaluation Program Planning,18,(1):77-87.
  • 8郑日昌,崔丽霞.二十年来我国教育研究方法的回顾与反思[J].教育研究,2001,22(6):17-21. 被引量:79
  • 9瞿葆奎.教育科学分类:问题与框架--教育科学分枝学科丛书代序[A].唐莹.元教育学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2002-9..
  • 10Tashakkori,A & Teddlie,C.(1998).Mixed Methodology:Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol.46).Thousand Oaks,CA:sage.

二级参考文献6

共引文献100

同被引文献518

二级引证文献292

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部