期刊文献+

基于证据理论的舰船论证方案综合评价方法 被引量:3

An approach for comprehensive assessment of warship argumentation project based on evidence theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 建立舰船论证方案综合评价指标体系,针对舰船论证方案综合评价中不确定性指标难以定量化的问题,提出用证据理论处理舰船不确定性问题的主观判断,使不确定性指标得以定量化表示;结合标准化后的确定性指标,借鉴最大期望值决策准则对备选舰船论证方案进行综合评价,通过其在某型舰船研制方案选择中的应用,证实了方法的有效性,从而探索了一种对舰船论证方案进行科学合理的综合评价方法,在舰船研制或改进方案的选择中具有实际应用价值。 The comprehensive evaluation index system of warship is established. Aiming at the uncertain indexes being hard to quantitative in warship comprehensive assessment, the method based on evidence theory is put forward to deal with the subjective judgments of doubt problem, which has the doubt index quantitative. Then, combining the standardized doubtless quantitative indexes, the maximum expectation decision rule is referred for comprehensive assessment of prepared warship. The method is verified in some warship comprehensive estimate in project selection. The method has great value in practical application in the project selection of development and improvement of warship,
出处 《船海工程》 北大核心 2006年第6期74-77,共4页 Ship & Ocean Engineering
关键词 D-S理论 舰船论证方案 综合评价 D-S theory warship argumentation project comprehensive assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献13

  • 1IMO Msc/Circ.1023&MEPC/Circ 392. Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment(FSA) for use in the IMO Rule-Making Process,5 April 2002,3~5
  • 2段新生. 证据理论与决策、人工智能. 北京:中国人民大学出版社,1993.16-28
  • 3Yang JianBo ,Sen Pratyush. A general multi-level Evaluation process for hybrid MADM with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1994,24(10):1458~1472
  • 4Pollasek A, Tversky A. A theory of risk[J]. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1970, (7) : 540- 533.
  • 5Fishburn P C. Foundations of risk measurement I,risk as probable loss[J]. Management Science, 1984,30(2) :296-406.
  • 6Yang J B, Singh M G. An evidential resaonining approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty[J]. IEEE Trans on Systens, Man, and Cybernetics, 1994, (24):1-18.
  • 7段新生,证据理论与决策、人工智能,1993年
  • 8Ling Tingpeng,OR,1988年,36卷,6期
  • 9Chip Heath,Amos Tversky. Preference and belief: Ambiguity and competence in choice under uncertainty[J] 1991,Journal of Risk and Uncertainty(1):5~28
  • 10杨春,李怀祖.一个证据推理模型及其在专家意见综合中的应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2001,21(4):43-48. 被引量:68

共引文献61

同被引文献20

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部