期刊文献+

预算民主恳谈:民主治理的挑战与机遇——新河镇预算民主恳谈案例研究 被引量:31

Deliberative Discussion On Budgeting:Opportunities And Challenges Of Democratic Governance——A Case Study Of Xinhe
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在过去的十年里,中国政府的预算改革主要集中在技术层面,例如零基预算改革、政府采购改革、国库集中支付等等。然而,在现代社会中,公共预算更深层次的问题应该是如何处理预算和政府民主治理之间的关系。本文介绍了2006年浙江温岭新河镇的预算民主恳谈。预算民主恳谈是中国政府预算管理的又一次重大革新,它的贡献在于通过重构公民和国家之间的关系,增强公民和政府官员的民主理财意识,提高预算决策的科学性,推动了地方政府的民主治理。本文发现,预算民主恳谈在新河的出现,并不是偶然的事情,而是社会变迁带来国家治理模式转变的必然结果。 In the past decade, budgetary reform in China has focused on technical innovation, such as zero-based budgeting, procurement management, treasure management, etc. However, in modern society, the more basic fundamental budgeting issue is how to deal with the relationship between budgeting and democratic governance. This study describes the process of the 2006 deliberative discussion on budgeting in Xinhe, a town in Zhejiang province. Deliberative discussion on budgeting is a significant.innovation in public budgeting in Chinese local government. It reconstructures the relationship between citizens and state and enhances democratic budgeting management, thus promoting democratic governance at local governments. The paper argues that deliberative of social change on state governance in China. discussion on budgeting is the result of the impacts
作者 牛美丽
出处 《华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期14-20,共7页 Journal of Central China Normal University:Humanities and Social Sciences
基金 中山大学二期"985工程"公共管理与社会发展创新基地专项资金
关键词 预算 民主恳谈 民主治理 社会变迁 budgeting deliberative discussion democratic governance social change
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1JONATHAN KAHN. Budgeting Democracy: State Building and Citizenship in America, 1890-1928 [M].Ithaca and London: Cornell University press, 1997.
  • 2慕毅飞,陈奕敏.民主恳谈:温岭人的创造[M].北京;中央编译出版社,2005:1.
  • 3陈奕敏.预算民主:乡镇参与式公共预算的探索[J].学习时报,2006,(1).
  • 4胡念飞.温岭试验乡镇治理新模式:民主催生公共预算[N].南方周末,2006-03-16.
  • 5GORDON WHITE, JUDE HOWELL and SHANG XIAO YUAN. In Search of Civil Society: Market Reform and Social Change in Contemporary China[M]. Oxford University Press, 1996:9.
  • 6BAOGANG HE. The Democratic Implications of Civil Society in China[M]. New York,St. Martin's Press, 1997:13.
  • 7何包钢.中国的参与和协商制度[C]∥陈剩勇,何包钢.协商民主的发展:协商民主理论与中国地方民主国际学术研讨会论文集.北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006:103.
  • 8卡罗尔·佩特曼.参与和民主理论[M].陈尧,译.上海:上海世纪出版集团,2006:9.
  • 9AARON WILDAVSKY. Political Implications of Budgetary Reform [J]. Public Administration Review, 1961, 21(4):185.

共引文献50

同被引文献416

引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部