期刊文献+

不同雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架在老年冠心病患者中的应用与研究 被引量:2

The application of rapamycin drug-eluting stents in elderly patients with coronary heart disease
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架在老年冠心病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中应用的安全性和有效性。方法入选320例冠心病患者,分为国产雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架组(Firebird组)160例,进口雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架组(Cypher组)160例。比较两组置入支架后6个月随访时的临床不良事件和再狭窄率。结果Firebird组共置入支架197枚,Cypher组共置入支架204枚。临床6个月随访示Firebird组临床不良事件3例,Cypher组4例,差异无显著性意义。6个月期随访造影显示Firebird组(66例)和Cypher组(77例)支架内再狭窄各出现1例。结论雷帕霉素药物洗脱支架Firebird和Cypher类似,而且Firebird有更高的效价比。 Objective To investigate the feasibility, safety and efficacy of drug-elufing stent implanting in elderly patients with coronary heart disease. Methods 320 coronary heart disease patients were collected and divided into Firebird group ( 160 cases) and Cypher group ( 160 cases). The incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and restenosis rates between the two groups were compared 6 months after stenting. Results 197 stents were implanted in Firebird group and 204 stents in Cypher group . After 6 months the incidences of MACE in Firebird group and Cypher group were 3 and 4 cases respectively, with no significant difference. One case of instent restenosis was found in each group by coronary angiography after 6 months. Conclusions The safety and efficacy of Firebird were similar to those of Cypher. Moreover, the cost-effect ratio was higher in Firebird group.
出处 《中华老年心脑血管病杂志》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第1期17-19,共3页 Chinese Journal of Geriatric Heart,Brain and Vessel Diseases
关键词 冠状动脉疾病 西罗莫司 支架 冠状动脉再狭窄 coronary disease sirolimus stents coronary restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Morice MC, Serruys PW, Sousa JE, et al. A randomized comparisonof a sirolimus-eluting stent with a standard stent for coronary revascularization[J] .N Engl J Med,2002,346:1773-1780.
  • 2Moses JW, Leon MB, Popma JJ, et al. Sirolimus-duting stents versus standard stents in patients with stenosis in a native coronary artery [J]. N Engl J Med,2003,349:1315-1323.
  • 3Pache J, Dibra A, Mehilli J, et al, Drug-eluting stents compared with thin-strut bare stents for the reduction of restenosis: a prospective, randomized trial[J].Eur Heart J,2005,26:1262-1268.
  • 4Losordo DW, Isner JM, Diaz-Sandoval LJ. Endothelial recovery: the next target in restenosis prevention[J]. Circulation,2003,107: 2635- 2637.
  • 5Iijima R, Ikari Y, Amiya E, et al. The impact of metallic allergy onstent implantation: metal allergy and recurrence of in-stent restenosis[J]. Int J Cardiol,2005,104:319-325.
  • 6Serruys PW, de Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patientswith coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group[J]. N Engl J Med, 1994,331 : 489-495.
  • 7Dietz U, Dauer C, Lambertz H. Combining short stent implantation and dmg-eluting stenting for routine use yields a low restenosis rate [ J ]. Curt Control Trials Cardiovasc Med, 2005,6:18.
  • 8Nilsen DW, Melberg T, Larsen AI, et al. Late complications following the deployment of drug eluting stents[ J]. Int J Cardiol,2006,109: 398-401.
  • 9Savonitto S, Ambrosini V, Marzocchi A, et al. Drug therapy during percutaneous coronary interventions in stable and unstable coronary artery disease: the Italian Drug Evaluation in Angioplasty (IDEA) study[J] .Ital Heart J, 2005,6:106-118.
  • 10Urban P, C, ershlick AH, C.uagliumi G, et al. Safety of coronarysirolimus-eluting stents in daily chnical practice: one-year foUow-up of the e-Cypher registry[J]. Circulation,2006,113:1434-1441.

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部