期刊文献+

石化生产装置安全现状模糊综合评价方法研究 被引量:45

Study on Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method for Safety State of Petrochemical Production Installations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据石油化工生产装置安全评价存在的模糊性和随机性的特点,在建立涵盖安全管理、工艺过程、作业环境、人员素质、生产设备和安全教育等一级指标的安全现状综合评价指标体系的基础上,运用模糊数学综合评判理论,采用基于信息论中熵概念计算指标权重的方法,提出了安全现状二级模糊综合评价方法。在组织专家对评价指标打分和确定模糊等级的基础上,应用该方法对某顺丁橡胶生产装置安全现状进行了综合评价,得出其安全状况为“较好”;并分析了指标体系中一级指标的状况,为制定安全对策措施提供了指导。该方法对于提高石油化工生产装置安全现状综合评价的客观性和准确性具有理论意义和实用价值。 In view of the existing fuzziness and randomness in the safety comprehensive evaluation for petrochemical production installations, an index system for the comprehensive evaluation of safety state, which comprises the first-class indices such as safety management, process, work environment, staff quality, production equipment, safety education, was put forward, and then a two-stage fuzzy assessment model for the evaluation of safety state of petrochemical production installations was established by applying the theory of fuzzy mathematics. In this model, the concept of entropy in information theory was also used so as to obtain the objective weight of each index and avoid subjective effect. On the basis of the scores and fuzzy grades of each evaluation index given by experts, a safety state comprehensive evaluation on the production installation of the Cisl ,4 Polybutadiene Rubber was carried out through applying this model, result shows the safety state for this installation is "the better". Finally, safety state of all first-class indices was analyzed so as to provide guidance for constituting safety countermeasures and safeguards. This method is of great theoretic significance and practical use in improving the objectivity and accurateness of the safety state evaluation for petrochemical production installations.
出处 《中国安全科学学报》 CAS CSCD 2007年第1期121-125,共5页 China Safety Science Journal
基金 湖南省自然科学基金资助(06JJ50079) 国家安全生产监督管理总局项目(06-407) 湖南省教育厅科研项目(05C174)。
关键词 石油化工生产装置 安全状况 模糊综合评价 熵技术 安全评价 petrochemical production installation safety state fuzzy comprehensive evaluation entropy technology safety assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献31

  • 1庄绪航.企业安全评价探讨——上海市第二轻工局安全评价简介[J].上海劳动保护技术,1993(2):21-27. 被引量:4
  • 2王广亮.高度危害化学品处理过程的安全管理[J].化工劳动保护(安全技术与管理分册),1996(1):41-44. 被引量:3
  • 3蒋永明,沈荣祖.石油化工企业建设项目安全评价与实践[J].化工劳动保护(安全技术与管理分册),1996(2):7-9. 被引量:3
  • 4刘啸武.氯碱生产的安全性评价方法探讨[J].化工劳动保护(安全技术与管理分册),1996(4):5-8. 被引量:1
  • 5中国石油化工集团公司.石油化工安全技术[M].Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1988.361-384.
  • 6蒋绿强and李永新.Hazard evaluation on fire and explosion for glycol unit.化工劳动保护,1999,20(11):395-397.
  • 7郭臣and李延渊.Research of the application of integrative safety evaluation methods quantitative examination mapping-fire and explosion index hazard classification-systemic safety analysis on the local vital parts.化工劳动保护,2000,21(9):314-316.
  • 8Diven J, Griffing D, Thorpe A, et al. Fault Tree Analysis System User's Guide[R]. CSC-RL-SCI-122, June 26, 1975.
  • 9中国石油化工公司安全与环保监督局.石油化工安全工程[M].Beijing:China Petrochemical Press,1999. 130~132.
  • 10顾祥柏. 石油化工安全分析方法及应用[M].Beijing:Chemical Industry Press,2001. 243~244.

共引文献155

同被引文献215

引证文献45

二级引证文献260

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部