期刊文献+

油田工人生命质量及影响因素调查 被引量:5

INVESTIGATION OF FACTORS RELATED TO QUALITY OF LIFE OF WORKERS IN THE OIL FIELD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]调查油田工人的生命质量及影响因素。[方法]用简明健康调查问卷(SF-36),以访谈的形式对347名油田工人进行调查。[结果]生命质量很差和较差者占4.90%,一般者占13.83%,生命质量较好者占45.53%。很好者35.73%。女性在生理机能(PF)、生理职能(RP)、一般健康状况(GH)、社会功能(SF)、情感职能(RE)和精神健康(MH)均分显著高于男性。30岁以下组GH评分显著高于30岁以上组。8个因子均与文化程度和性别有密切关系,职业主要影响躯体疼痛(BP)、SF、RE和总分。除RP和MH外,其余6个因子均受工龄影响。[结论]受教育程度、性别、职业是影响油田工人生命质量的重要因素。 [Objective] To investigate the factors related to quality of life of workers in the oil field. [ Methods] 347 workers in the oil field were investigated by the medical outcomes study short-form 36 (SF-36) .[Results] The percentage of the worse and worst quality of life was about 4.90%. The percentage of the quality of life between bad and good was about 13.83%. The percentage of the better quality of life was about 45.53%. The percentage of the best quality of life was about 35.73%. The scores of physical function (PF), physical role (PR), general health (GH) , social function (SF) , emotional role (RE) and mental health (MH) were significantly higher in female than in male. The score of GH was significantly higher in the workers below 30. Education degree and sex were closely related to all the eight factors. Except RP and MH, the score of the rest six faetors were related to years of work. [ Conclusion] Education degree, sex and occupation may be the important factors that influence the quality of life of workers in the oil field.
出处 《现代预防医学》 CAS 北大核心 2007年第2期214-217,共4页 Modern Preventive Medicine
基金 铁道部科技基金资助项目(J2000Z089)
关键词 油田工人 生命质量 简明健康调查问卷(SF-36) Workers in the oil field Quality of life SF-36
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献35

  • 1盛承东,王祖承,李春波,方华.健康状况调查问卷应用于精神分裂症患者中的信度和效度[J].上海精神医学,2002,14(3):151-153. 被引量:46
  • 2马良庆,吕玉民,娄淑艳,周连城,韩林,李镇江,余善法,崔明煊.职业紧张对机体免疫功能影响的研究[J].中国行为医学科学,1995,4(4):185-186. 被引量:14
  • 3于普林,吴雅凤,赵兵利,郑国珍,宋晓光,张培兰,何慧德.老年离退休职工生活质量调查分析[J].中华老年医学杂志,1996,15(6):370-371. 被引量:40
  • 4王爱萍 邹华伟 等.SF-36对三类病人健康状况测量结果的分析[J].国际中华身心医学杂志,1999,1(1):44-45.
  • 5吴文源.日常生活能力量表[A].见张明园 编著.精神科评定量表手册[C].湖南科技出版社,1998.166~168.
  • 6吴文源.社会功能筛选量表[A].见张明园 编著.精神科评定量表手册[C].湖南科技出版社,1998.163~166.
  • 7刘朝杰.SF-36在国内一般人群中研究具有良好的信度与效度[J].华西医科大学学报,2001,(32):39.
  • 8Ware JE. SF - 36 Health Survey. Marmual and Interpretation Guide. Boston. MA: The Health Institute, 1993 .
  • 9Gandek B, Ware JE Jr, Aaronson NK, et al. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the SF - 36 in eleven countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. J Clin Epidemiol, 1998 , 51 (11) : 1149 -1158.
  • 10Ware JE Jr, Gandek B. Overview of the SF - 36 Health Survey and the International Quality of Life Assessment (IQOLA) Project. J Clin Elaidemiol, 1998, 51 (11): 903- 912.

共引文献1014

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部