期刊文献+

晚期卵巢癌化疗联合放疗的临床研究 被引量:4

Clinical study on advanced ovarian cancer by chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨化疗联合放疗综合治疗晚期卵巢癌的疗效和毒性。方法:随机将不能手术的晚期卵巢癌患者分为两组,即化疗组和化放疗组,两组各36例,均使用IPA方案,IF01.2g/m^2,i.vdripd1~5,Mesna0.4gi.v(0、4、8h)d1~5,DDP60~80mg/m^2,i.vd1,ADM40~60mg/m^2,i.vd1。化疗组用该方案连续化疗3个周期,每3周重复1次;化放疗组先用该方案化疗1周期,接着用6MV—X线全盆腔外照射DT40GY/dW,再缩野至癌灶局部加量DT10~20GY/1~2W,放疗结束后,休息1周,再化疗2个周期,每3周重复1次。结果:化疗组和化放疗组有效率(CR+PR)为77.8%和100%,1、3年生存率分别为60.1%,32.7%和73.1%,48.2%。毒性反应:以骨髓抑制和消化道反应为主。结论:化疗联合放疗综合治疗晚期卵巢癌能提高局控率和生存率,且并发症发生率较低,是一种安全、有效、较理想的治疗方法。 Objective: To study the effect and side effect of advanced ovarian cancer treated by chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy. Methods: Seventy two cases of advanced ovarian cancer can not accepted operation were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 received chemotherapy,treated by IPA 3 times, 3 weeks a circle. Chemotherapy combined with radiotherapy was given to Group 2, treated by IPA 1 times , all pelvis field accepted radiotherapy (6MV - X Ray) DT40GY/4W,thenreduced the field and dosage to DT10 - 20GY/1 -2W. Chemotherapy was given after a week,3 weeks a circle. Results: The efficient rate ( CR + PR) were 77.8% and 100% respectively. 1,3 years survival rate were 60.1% ,32.7% and 73.1% ,48.2%. Side effects included prolonged nausea and vomiting,leukopenia. Conclusion: Chemotherapy combined radiotherapy may increased local control rate and survival rate . The side effect was lower. It is a safe and efficient therapy for advanced ovarian cancer.
机构地区 陕西省汉中市
出处 《现代肿瘤医学》 CAS 2007年第2期238-239,共2页 Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词 卵巢癌 化学治疗 放射治疗 预后 ovarian cancer chemotherapy radiotherapy prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献57

  • 1[1]Thigpen J. Limited stage ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol, 1999, 26:29 ~33
  • 2[2]Young RC, Pecorelli S. Management of early ovarian cancer. Semin Oncol, 1998, 25:335~339
  • 3[3]Dembo AJ, Darry D, Stenwig AE, et al. Prognostic factors in patients with stage Ⅰ epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol, 1990, 75:263~273
  • 4[4]Young RC, Waltan LA, Ellenberg SS, et al. Adjuvant therapy in stage Ⅰ an Ⅱ epithelial ovarian cancer: Results of two prospective randomized trial. NEnglJMed, 1990, 322:1021~1027
  • 5[5]Favalli G, Odicino F, Torri V, et al. Early stage ovarian cancer. The Italian contribution to clinical research. An update. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2001, 11 (Suppl) :12~19
  • 6[6]Gershenson DM. Advances in the management of early stage epithelial ovarian cancer. ASCO 37# Annual Meeting Educational Book, 2001,462 ~ 467
  • 7[7]McGuire WP, Hoskins WJ, Brady MF, et al. Gyclophosphamide and cisplatin compared with paclitaxel and cisplatin in patient with stage Ⅲ and Ⅳ ovarian cancer. N Eegl J Med, 1996, 334:1 ~ 6
  • 8[8]Piccart MJ, Bertelsen K, Jamesk, et al. Randomized intergroup trial of cisplatin- paclitaxel versus cisplatin - cyclophosphamide in woman with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Three year result. J Natl Cancer Inst, 2000, 92:699~708
  • 9[9]Cassidy J, Vergote I, Bertelsen K, et al. Long- term follow - up comfirms a survival advantage of the paclitaxel- cisplatin (TP) regimen over the cyclophosphamide- cisplatin (CCP) combination in advanced cancer.(AOC) Inter J Gynec Cancer, 2002, 12:558 ~ 559
  • 10[10]Ozolz RF, Bundy BN, Fowler J, et al. Randonmized phase Ⅲ study of cisplatin/paclitaxel versus carboplatir/paclitaxel in optimal stage Ⅲ epithelial ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology group trail. Pro Am Soc Clin Oncol, 1999, 18:1373a (abstr)

共引文献9

同被引文献93

引证文献4

二级引证文献52

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部