摘要
通过选取经典的THOG问题作为实验材料,探讨了大学生解决具体以及抽象选言推理问题的认知机制,结果发现:(1)具体内容的选言推理问题对抽象内容的选言推理问题有明显的促进效应,表现为先解决逃犯问题后解决THOG问题组的正确率显著高于先解决THOG问题后解决逃犯问题组;(2)提供笼统的解题策略对大学生解决THOG问题几乎没有促进作用。
The THOG problem was used to study the cognition mechansim of disjunctive reasoning. The result showed that the concrete rather than the abstract disjunctive reasoning problen was accountable for the better performance,Using the concrete problem could facilitate the performance of the abstract problem. In the o~.dition of providing strategies for the subjects, the experimental group was not able to show any significant difference compared with the controlled group. Providing simple and general strategies for college students did not have much effect because they could independently consider the problems according to their way of thinking.
出处
《心理科学》
CSSCI
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第1期232-234,共3页
Journal of Psychological Science
基金
国家重点学科西南大学基础心理学项目资助(项目编号:西国重04001)
关键词
THOG问题
“逃犯问题”
选育推理
内容类别
THOG problem, "escaped criminal problem", disjunctive reasoning, content category