期刊文献+

当前教育评鉴研究的主要课题 被引量:3

Current Issues of Educational Evaluation Studies
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对台湾师范大学新近成立“教育评鉴及发展中心”,讨论一个大学教育评鉴研究机构的设立目标及研究任务,强调从质量保证角度,教育评鉴宜涵盖成果评量、学校评鉴及认可认证三个领域。教育评鉴研究可分三个层次:(1)涉及评鉴程序、方法论的实务层次;(2)国际比较研究的层次;(3)后设评鉴的层次。针对教育政策评鉴是否纳入教育评鉴范围,可视实际需要而定。大学成立教育评鉴中心的主要任务,除了塑造校园里各单位的质量文化外,宜建立教育评鉴数据库,并积极与国际质量保证网络接轨,发展各类自我评鉴规范及有关表格,同时为日后发展校际双学位课程提供大学信息查证预作准备。 On the basis of the foundation of Educational Evaluation and Development Center in Taiwan Normal University,this paper discusses the target and task of a college educational e-valuation institution.From the viewpoint of quality assurance,educational evaluation must cover outcomes assessment,institutional evaluation and accreditation.The educational evaluation re-search can be categorized into three dimensions as follows:(1)procedural reviews and method-ological studies;(2)international comparison studies;(3)meta-evaluation issues.In case of need,educational policy evaluation can also be included.In conclusion,the author proposes that the main task of a college educational evaluation center is to establish an educational evaluation database,in addition to developing an embedding quality culture in campus.Furthermore,a col-lege educational evaluation center should establish working relationship with international net-works of quality assurance,and make self-evaluation regulations and relative forms.Meanwhile,it must make some preparation to provide college information inquiry for inter-college double de-grees courses.
作者 郭为藩
出处 《高教发展与评估》 2007年第1期32-40,共9页 Higher Education Development and Evaluation
关键词 质量保证 学校评鉴 绩效责任 成果评量 关键能力 后设评鉴 quality assurance institutional evaluation accountability outcome assessment key competences meta-evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Brown,Roger.Quality assurance in higher education:the UK experience since 1992.London:RoutledgeFalmer,2004.
  • 2Schade,Angelika.Recent Quality assurance activities in Germany.European Journal of Education.2003,38(3):285~290.
  • 3Bok,Derey.Universities in the marketplace:Commercialization of higherEducation.Princeton:Princeton University Press,2003.
  • 4Sedlacek,William E.Beyond the big test:noncognitive assessment in higher education.San Francisco:Jossey-Bass,2004.
  • 5Johnson,Valen E.Grade inflation:a crisis in college education.New York:Springer-Verlag,2003.
  • 6简茂发,李琪明.当代教育指标-国际比较观点[Z].台北:学富文化,2001.
  • 7Rychen,D.S.& Salganik,L.H.Key competencies for a successful life and a well-functioning society.In Definition and Selection of Competencies:Theoretical and Conceptual Foundations.O.E.C.D.,2003.
  • 8戴晓霞.全球化与学术卓越的追求[Z].全球化时代的大学理念与大学教育学术研讨会,中坜:中央大学,2005.
  • 9Scriven,Michael.An introduction to meta evaluation.Educational Product Report[J].1696(2):36~38.
  • 10Ginsberg,Rick & Plank,David N.(Eds.).Commissions,reports,reforms,and educational policy.Westport,Conn.:Pareger,1995.

同被引文献29

引证文献3

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部