期刊文献+

近年来国内文学主体间性理论研究述评 被引量:1

Comment on Domestic Theoretical Research into Literary Inter-subjectivity in Recent Years
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文学主体间性研究在我国的兴起既是对上世纪80年代主体性问题大讨论的批判继承,又具有自身深刻的现实根源。目前这一研究主要围绕它的理论内涵及其运用展开,并在实践美学与后实践美学的论争中走向成熟。其实质在于对主体性问题的重新理解和在新的条件下对于文学研究的反思和进一步发展。作为新的理论形态的研究,它在取得丰硕成果的同时,也留下了广阔且具有重大价值的理论空间。 The beginning of research into literary inter-subjectivity in our country is not only the critical inheritage of the discussion in the 1980s, but also has its own deep realistic origin. At present, the research concentrates on its theoretical content and application, and become mature in the debate of practical aestheticism and post-aestheticism. The essence lies in the new comprehension of the subject issue and reflection on literary research and further development under the new conditions. Although great achievements have been obtained as a new form of theory, it still leaves great theoretical room with significant values to be explored.
作者 刘新敖
出处 《安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版)》 2006年第6期95-99,共5页 Journal of Anqing Teachers College(Social Science Edition)
关键词 史学 主体间性 主体 literature inter-subjectivity subject
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

二级参考文献26

共引文献397

同被引文献8

  • 1Chase, Richard. The American Novel and its Tradition[M]. London: Gordian Press, 1957:199.
  • 2文美惠.阿诺德.班奈特和他的“五镇小说”[C],/柳鸣九.自然主义.北京:中国社会科学出版社.1988:391.
  • 3Bennett, Arnold. The Author's Craft[M]. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1914:24.
  • 4Pearson, Judith Ann Siegal. Marriges in the novels of Arnold Bennett[M]. Saint Louis: Washington University Press,1997:27-28.
  • 5Hepburn, James G. Arnold Bennett: The critical heritage[M]. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1981:161.
  • 6Powell, David. The Edwardian crisis: Britain 1901-1914[M]. London : MacMillan, 1996:78.
  • 7Bennett, Arnold. Our Women[M]. New York: George H.Doran Company, 1920:226.
  • 8Batchelor, John. The Edwardian Novelists[M]. London:Gerald Duckworth & Co. Ltd, 1982:154.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部