期刊文献+

如何走出个案——从个案研究到扩展个案研究 被引量:332

How Can We Go Beyond the Case? From the Case Study to the Extended Case Study
原文传递
导出
摘要 个案研究始终面临着如何处理特殊性与普遍性、微观与宏观之间的关系问题。随着现代社会日趋复杂,对独特个案的描述与分析越来越无法体现整个社会的性质;定量方法的冲击更使个案研究处于风雨飘摇之中。针对个案研究面临的上述问题,本文考察了四种主要处理方式:超越个案的概括、个案中的概括、分析性概括以及扩展个案方法。扩展个案方法旨在建立微观社会学的宏观立场,它试图立足宏观分析微观,通过微观反观宏观,并在实践中处处凸现理论的功能。此外,经由理论重构产生的一般性法则使其较好地处理了特殊性与普遍性的关系问题。 Case studies are always confronted with the problem of the relationship between the particular and the general and macro-and micro-aspects.Displaying the features of a whole society through the description and analysis of unique cases becomes increasingly difficult as modern society becomes increasingly complex.The impact of quantitative methods makes the situation of case studies even more precarious.The present article examines four main methods of handling the problem,i.e.,generalization tiat goes beyond the case study,generalization within the case study,analytical generalization and extended case study methodology.The last of these aims to establish a macroscopic standpoint for micro-sociology and attempts to analyze the micro-aspects from this standpoint,reflecting on the macro-aspect through the micro-aspect and emphasizing the function of theory throughout practice.Moreover,the general rules generated in theoretical reconstruction perform better in handling the relationship between the particular and the general.
作者 卢晖临 李雪
出处 《中国社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期118-130,共13页 Social Sciences in China
  • 相关文献

参考文献49

  • 1马凌诺斯基.《西太平洋的航海者》,梁永佳,李绍明,译.华夏出版社,2002年.
  • 2Robert E. Stake, Qualitative Case Studies, In Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds.), TheSage Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, 2005, p. 444.
  • 3Robert E. Stake, Qualitative Case Studies.
  • 4Robert S. Lynd & Helen Merrell Lynd, Middletown: A Study in Contemporary American Culture. NewYork: Harcourt Brace Company, 1929.
  • 5埃米尔·涂尔干.《宗教生活的基本形式》,渠东,等译.上海人民出版社,1999年,第548—549页.
  • 6拉德克利夫-布朗.《社会人类学方法》,夏建中,译.北京:华夏出版社.2002
  • 7Michael Burawoy, The Extended Case Method, Ethnography Unbound. Berkeley: University ofCalifornia Press, 1991.
  • 8Maurice Freedman, The Study of Chinese Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1979, p. 382.
  • 9Maurice Freedman, The Study of Chinese Society, p. 383.
  • 10Maurice Freedman, The Study of Chinese Society, p. 383.

二级参考文献53

  • 1张静.“雷格瑞事件”引出的知识论问题.清华社会学评论,2000,(2):106-130.
  • 2克利福德 格尔茨著 约日碧力戈译.《文化的解释》[M].上海人民出版社,1999年1月.第13页.
  • 3格尔兹 纳日碧力格等译.《文化的解释》[M].上海人民出版社,1999年.5页.
  • 4克利福德·格尔兹著 韩莉译.《文化的解释》[M].南京:译林出版社,1999年版.第328页.
  • 5Clifford Geertz, 1995, After the Fact: Two Countries,Four Decades, One Anthropologist, p.3.
  • 6Clifford Geertz, 1995, After the Fact: Two Countries,Four Decades, One Anthropologist, p.11.
  • 7Clifford Geertz, 2000, Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics, p.133-134.
  • 8Clifford Geertz, 2000, Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics, p.137.
  • 9王铭铭.“‘格尔兹文化论丛’译序”,载格尔兹.《文化的解释》,第1—18页,上海人民出版社,1999年.
  • 10Clifford Geertz, 2000, Available Light: Anthropological Reflections on Philosophical Topics, p.65.

二级引证文献3284

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部