期刊文献+

中国农村义务教育属性及经费分担机制探讨 被引量:2

Discussion on the Property of Chinese Compulsory Education in Rural Areas and the Mechanism of Sharing-expenses
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在中国义务教育财政投入上,“以县为主”的体制安排已经不能适应中国社会的发展,带来了一系列新的问题。义务教育的根本问题是经费的问题,如何界定义务教育的产品属性和政府间的职责,会直接影响到国家对义务教育财政保障机制的选择问题。义务教育作为外溢性很强的地方性公共产品,由政府提供有利于实现社会公平,在财政体制安排上则应由中央和省级政府担当主要的经费投入责任,由县级政府负责主要的管理责任。 As far as the financial investment into Chinese compulsory education is concerned, the "county-centered" system cannot adjust to the social development any more. This has led to a sequence of new problems. The basic problem of compulsory education lies in the expenses of education. The definition of the products property and the responsibility of governments will influence directly the choice of financial security mechanism of compulsory education. As a local public product with strong influence,compulsory education will benefit the social fairness with government support. Furthermore, financially speaking,the central and provincial governments should play the role as the major investors and the county governments the principal managers.
作者 张娥 张启春
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第1期84-89,共6页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition
关键词 农村义务教育 以县为主 公共产品 转移支付 财政体制 rural compulsory education county-centered public product transfer payment financial system
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献33

  • 1钟晓敏.政府问财政转移支付论[M].上海:立信会计出版社,1998..
  • 2Hoxby, Caroline Minter, All School Finance Equalizations are not Created Equal, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Nov. 2001, pp. 1189-1231.
  • 3Hoxby, Caroline Minter, and Ilyana Kuziemko, Robin Hood and His Not-So-Merry Plan: Capitalization and the Self-Destruction of Texas' School Finance Equalization Plan, working paper, Harvard University,2004.
  • 4Epple, Dennis and Richard E. Romano, Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers,and Peer-Group Effects, American Economic Review, 1998, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 33 62.
  • 5Epple, Dennisand Richard E. Romano, Educational Vouchers and Cream Skimming, NBER working paper 9354, 2002.
  • 6Neal, Derek,How Vouchers Could Change the Market for Education, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, vol.16, no. 4, pp. 25-44.
  • 7Epple, Dennis and Richard E. Romano, Competition between Private and Public Schools, Vouchers, and Peer-Group Effects, American Economic Review, 1998, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 33-62.
  • 8Helen F. Ladd, School Vouchers: A Critical View, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 3-24.
  • 9Mun C. Tsang, Education and National Development in China since 1949 ; Oscillating Policies and Enduring Dilemmas, China Review, 2000, pp.579-618.
  • 10Mun C. Tsang, Intergovernmental Grants and the Financing of Compulsory Education in China, working paper, Teachers College Columbia University, 2001.

共引文献143

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部