期刊文献+

产权、代理成本和代理效率 被引量:401

Ownership, Agency Cost and Agency Efficiency
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文选择政府管制较少、竞争较为充分的电子电器行业作为研究对象,考察了产权制度与代理成本和代理效率的关系,得到以下结论:(1)在代理成本上,国有产权企业普遍高于混和产权企业,混和产权企业高于个人产权企业;在代理成本差异上,混和产权企业与个人产权企业的差异小于与国有产权企业的差异。(2)长期投资率和职工人数与代理成本呈显著正相关关系,而长期投资率、财务杠杆比率、职工人数等与代理效率呈显著负相关关系。(3)企业规模越大,不同产权的代理成本差异越小;反之代理成本差异越大。(4)随着市场竞争程度的提高,各类产权企业的代理成本都呈现下降趋势,其代理效率呈现提高趋势。我们研究的启示是国有企业改革的突破口应考虑如何降低其代理成本,解决的措施之一是产权改革,尤其是产权多元化的改革,其次是完善对投资和负债及冗员的监督和控制机制,以促进代理成本的降低和代理效率的提高。 This paper examines the relationships between ownership, agency cost and efficiency in Chinese transition economy. The main findings are as follows: (1) Agency cost of state-owned property rights is higher than that of diversified ownership, meanwhile the latter is higher than that of private property rights, and the agency cost differences between diversified ownership and private ownership is smaller than the differences between state-owned property rights and diversified ownership. (2)The ratio of long-term investments to assets and the number of employee are significantly positively related to agency cost, and the ratio of long-term investments to assets, financial leverage and the number of employee are significantly negatively relative with agency efficiency. (3) The differences of agency cost between alternative property rights are negatively relative with firms' scales. (4)With the strengthening of competition, the agency costs of various property rights are almost increasingly decreasing, and respectively the agency efficiency are gradually increasing. The direct implication of our study is that the objectives of the reform of SOEs should be focused on reducing the agency cost by means of promoting the reform of diversified property rights system, and establishing a efficient overseeing and controlling mechanism, otherwise SOEs will at last be extruded downright from rival market by private firms.
作者 李寿喜
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期102-113,共12页 Economic Research Journal
基金 2005年度国家社会科学基金项目"完善国有资产管理体制问题研究"的阶段性成果。项目批准号为05BJY003
关键词 国有产权 个人产权 代理成本 代理效率 SOEs Private Firms Agency Cost Agency Efficiency
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

二级参考文献90

  • 1张仁德,韩晶.国有经济腐败的委托代理因素分析[J].当代经济科学,2003,25(2):28-32. 被引量:24
  • 2钱颖一.企业的治理结构改革和融资结构改革[J].经济研究,1995,30(1):20-29. 被引量:264
  • 3张胜荣.看不见的资源与现代企业制度[J].经济研究,1995,30(10):41-47. 被引量:12
  • 4北京大学中国经济研究中心发展战略研究组.国有企业改革的回顾与展望[M].北京大学中国经济研究中心,2000..
  • 5林毅夫 平新乔.展望新千年的中国经济.中国经济研究[M].北京大学出版社,1999..
  • 6林毅夫 刘培林.《何以加速增长,唯解自生难题》[A]..北京大学中国经济研究中心工作论文[C].,2003..
  • 7施蒂格勒 弗里德兰.《管制者能管制什么电力部门的实例》[J].《法学与经济学杂志》,1962,(5).
  • 8勒布和穆尔.《施蒂格勒论文精粹》[M].商务印书馆,1999年出版..
  • 9施蒂格勒.《经济管制理论》[J].《经济与管理科学钟声杂志》,1971,(1).
  • 10勒布 穆尔.《施蒂格勒论文精粹》[M].商务印书馆,1999年出版..

共引文献3342

同被引文献6019

引证文献401

二级引证文献7605

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部