期刊文献+

用Alabama分析法比较安氏Ⅰ类错中国人与美国白人颅颌面结构差异

Compared the facial profile between the whites in america and the adults in Xi'an China with Angle's class I malocclusion by way of alabama analyzing method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究中国安氏Ⅰ类错成人与美国安氏Ⅰ类错白人牙颌颅面形态结构的差异。方法:从西安市11所大学2098名新生中选取符合标准的101名(男53名、女48名)安氏Ⅰ类错样本。拍摄头颅定位X线片,用第四军医大学口腔医学院头影测量软件测量,用Alabama分析法与美国安氏Ⅰ类错白人颅颌面测量结果进行比较分析。结果:中国西安地区安氏Ⅰ类错成人上下颌突度大,面型较突;平面倾斜度、上下中切牙倾斜度及下中切牙至NB线距均较大;Y轴相对SN平面夹角增大,生长方向为后下。结论:与美国安氏Ⅰ类错白人比较,中国西安地区安氏Ⅰ类错成人颅面结构呈现颌骨突度大、下切牙唇倾及下颌趋向后下等特征。 Objective To investigate the differences of the facial profile between the Whites in America and the adults in Xi'an China with Angle's ClassⅠ malocclusion. Methods 101 samples with Angle's Class Ⅰ malocclusion were selected from 2 098 university new students,including male 53; female 48. X ray cephalometric films were photoed and analysed by the measurement software of stomatological hospital,the Fourth Military Medical University.And the measurement results were compared with that of the whites in America. Results Compared with the whites in America,the facial profile of Xi'an adults in China was protruding with more convex maxilla and mandible,steeper occlusion and more inclined upper and lower central incisors.In addition,both the distance of the lower incisor to NB line and the angle of the Y axis to SN plane were larger,which showed abackward and downward growth tendency of mandible. Conclusion The adults with Angle's Class Ⅰ malocclusion in Xi'an China were characteristic of bigger jaw bone convexity,more labial inclined incisors and more backward and downward mandible.
出处 《中国美容医学》 CAS 2007年第1期104-106,共3页 Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine
关键词 Alabama分析法 安氏Ⅰ类错[牙合] 中国人与美国白人 头影测量 alabama method angle's class Ⅰ malocclusion the whites in America and the chinese cephalometric roentgenography
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献16

  • 1章宏毅,东耀峻,张国志.正颌外科X线头影测量分析——Ⅲ.湖北地区正常成人与北美白人牙颌颅面硬组织结构的比较[J].口腔医学纵横,1996,12(2):91-92. 被引量:4
  • 2-.第二次全国口腔健康流行病学抽样调查[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1999.132.
  • 3罗宗赉.成都市学生错He发生率的调查[J].中华口腔科杂志,1956,4(4):295-295.
  • 4Forsyth DB, Shaw WC, Richmond S: Digital imaging of cephalometric radiography, part 1 : advantages and limitations of digital imaging. The Angle Orthodontist, 1996,66( 1 ) : 37 -42.
  • 5Gotfredsen E, Kragskov J, Wenzel A:Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor - displayed digital images. Dentomaxillofac Radiol,1999 ,28: 123 - 126.
  • 6Rudolph D J, Sinclair PM, Coggins JM : Automatic computerized radiographic identification of cephalometric landmarks. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1998,113: 173 - 179.
  • 7Forsyth DB, Shaw WC, Richmond S: Digital imaging of cephalometric radiographs, part 2: image quality. The Angle Orthodontist,1996,66(1): 43-50.
  • 8Taylor WH, Hitchcock HP. The Alabama Analysis. Am J Orthod, 1966,52 ( 4 ) :245
  • 9Hitchcock HP. A cephalometric description of class Ⅰ malocclusion. Am J Orthod,1969. 124
  • 10孙惠.西安地区正常[Z].,..

共引文献297

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部