摘要
在法医学鉴定中,当暴力所致的原发损害与医疗过失行为造成的继发损害并存时,应区别“不可避免的”继发损害和“可以避免的”继发损害,并将原发损害与“不可避免的”继发损害一起,作为损伤程度鉴定的依据,而不能将“可以避免的”继发损害也作为损伤程度鉴定的依据。《人体重伤鉴定标准》第七十二条规定了外伤后腹部积血的鉴定原则,如何应用该条款评定损伤程度,需对原发损害与继发损害加以区别,同时,有必要对这一条款进行必要的修改。
When primary injuries caused by penetrating violence and secondary injuries by faulty medical procedures are both present, it is important to distinguish "avoidable" from "unavoidable" secondary injuries. The primary and "unavoidable" secondary injuries should be included as evidence for assessment of the degree and grade the injuries. to assess blood accumulation after injury Criterion of Severe Human Body Injury". have been stated in the seventy-two clause However, it dose not distinguish abdominal "avoidable" injuries The basic principles of "The Assessment blood accumulation caused by primary penetrating wounds from that resulted from secondary medical procedures. An amendment to the clause might be necessary.
出处
《法医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
2007年第1期39-41,共3页
Journal of Forensic Medicine
关键词
腹部穿透创
原发损害
继发损害
法医学鉴定
Penetrating wounds
human abdomen
primary injury
secondary injury
medico-legal assessment