期刊文献+

基于骨架结构分类法的递进式药物筛选(英文)

Progressive screening using scaffold-based classification approach
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文报告一种新颖的基于骨架结构分类法的递进式药物筛选(PS-SCA)技术。此技术在美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)的八组细胞水平上的高通量筛选实验数据上进行了测试,结果表明,基于拓扑结构数据的递进式筛选可以极大地降低药物筛选的代价,缩短筛选时间。模拟实验证明,PS-SCA递进式筛选技术包括三个阶段:(1)骨架多样性采样筛选试验:(2)活性化合物发现试验;(3)可忽略的多余筛选试验。运用PS-SCA递进式筛选技术,可以在只筛选20%的化合物情况下找到最有意义的70-80%的活性化合物。而且,这70%-80%的活性化合物中包含了关键的结构骨架。 Progressive screening using scaffold-based classification approach (PS-SCA) is presented in the paper. The process has been tested on eight NCI cell line HTS data sets. The results show that 2D structure based progressive screening can expedite hit and lead identification processes with dramatically reduced costs. It is discovered that the PS-SCA process only consists of three types of virtual screening trials: (1) Seeding trial, the first trial, which selects compounds based on scaffold diversity, and find initial seed-hits to discover more hits in further screening trials, (2) Fishing trial, the second trial, which discovers all promising hits based on the knowledge of the seed-hits, and (3) Rest trials, which can only find additional or random hits, and therefore can be skipped in screening process to reduce hit/lead identification costs. The PS-SCA process experiments on eight NCI screening data sets show that it can discover 70%-80% of hits by screening only 20% compounds in the inventory, and hop privileged scaffolds from HTS data.
作者 徐峻 梁逸曾
出处 《计算机与应用化学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期23-30,共8页 Computers and Applied Chemistry
基金 国家自然科学基金(20235020。20475066)
关键词 递进式药物筛选 基于骨架结构分类法 高通量筛选 药物研究 骨架结构鉴定 progressive screening, HTS, algorithm, scaffold-based classification approach, hit identification, drug discovery, scaffold hopping
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Oprea TI, Davis AM, Teague SJ and Leeson PD. Is there a difference between leads and drugs? A Historical Perspective. J Chem Inf Comput Sci, 2001, 41:1308-1315.
  • 2Jones-Hertzog DK, Mukhopadhyay P, Keefer CE and Young SS. Use of recursive partitioning in the sequential screening of G-protein-coupled receptors. J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods, 1999, 42:207-215.
  • 3Hessler G, Zimmermann M, Matter H, Evers A, Naumann T, Lengauer Tand Rarey M. Multiple-ligand-based virtual screening: methods and applications of the MTree approach. J Med Chem, 2005, 48:6575-6584.
  • 4Rarey M and Dixon JS. Feature trees: A new molecular similarity measure based on tree matching. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design,1998, 12:471-490.
  • 5Rarcy M and Stahl M. Similarity searching in large combinatorial chemistry spaces. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 2001,15:497-520.
  • 6Young SS, Ekins S and Lambert CG, So many targets, so many compounds, but so few resources. Current Drug Discovery, 2002, (12):17-22.
  • 7Valler MJ and Green D. Diversity screening versus focused screening in drug discovcry.DDT, 2000, 5(7):286-293.
  • 8Lengauer T, Lemmen C, Rarey M and Zimmermarm M. Novel technologies for virtual screening. DDT, 2004, 9(1):27-34.
  • 9Abt M, Lim Y, Sacks l, Xie M and Young SS. A sequential approach for identifying lead compounds in large chemical databases. Statistical Science, 2001, 16(2):154-168.
  • 10Xu J. A new approach to find natural chemical structure classes. J Medicinal Chemistry, 2002, 45:5311-5320.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部