期刊文献+

论清中叶毗陵诗派与性灵派之差异

The Differences Between Piling School of Poetry in the Mid-term Qing Dynasty and the School of Disposition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清中叶毗陵诗派的主要成员是“毗陵七子”、赵翼、钱维乔等常州诗人,他们与袁枚多有交往,其诗论在倡导性情、主张创新等观点上比较接近。但两派的区别也比较明显:虽同谓性情,袁枚将男女之情放在首位,而毗陵诗派更重伦理亲情及朋友之情;毗陵诗派更重诗品和人品,诗歌品格较好;毗陵诗派重学而性灵派更重才。毗陵诗派持论公允,在一定程度上有纠正性灵派弊端的作用。 In the mid Qing Dynasty, Piling School of Poetry is flowering with the emergence of a group of poets such as "Seven Piling poets" ,Zhao Yi and Qian Weiqiao, ect. Their intimate association with Yuan Mei lies in expressing true feelings and initiating the constant innovation of poetry together. But Piling School of Poetry is different from the School of Disposition in that poets of Piling School lay equal stress on disposition of one's own and observance of Confucian traditions, attach importance to poetic feature and personality, knowledge and moral character. Their theories to a certain extent overcome the flaws of the School of Disposition.
作者 纪玲妹
出处 《南京师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期132-137,共6页 Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 毗陵诗派 “毗陵七子” 性灵派 Piling School of Poetry "Seven Piling poets" The School of Disposition
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1袁枚 王英志点校.随园诗话[M].南京:江苏古籍出版社,2000..
  • 2袁枚.小仓山房诗文集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1988..
  • 3洪亮吉.北江诗话[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1983.26.
  • 4杨伦.杜诗镜铨[M].北京;中华书局,1962.
  • 5钱维乔.竹初文钞[M]∥续修四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 6赵怀玉.亦有生斋文钞[M]∥续修四库全书.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002.
  • 7黄景仁.两当轩集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1983.
  • 8邵长蘅.青门剩稿[M].《四库全书存目丛书》本.济南:齐鲁书社,1997.
  • 9欧阳东风.晋陵先贤传[M].1868(同治七年),集贤斋刻本.
  • 10钱钟书.管锥编[M].中华书局,1986.第535-539页.

共引文献206

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部