期刊文献+

公用企业滥用行为与“混合型”管制改革 被引量:2

Abusive behaviors of Public Utilities and Reform of Mixing Regulation
原文传递
导出
摘要 公用企业滥用垄断地位行为是管制改革和中国反垄断法中的核心问题。本文采用线性城市模型证明,管制改革中纵向经营在位企业具有采取排他性行为对新企业实行市场封锁的激励。在此情况下,混合型管制体制具有相对的效率优势。中国自然垄断行业具有自然垄断、行为垄断和行政垄断三重交织的特点,垄断性公用企业具有特殊的滥用行为产生机理和滥用行为方式。反公用企业滥用行为应建立“混合型”管制体制模式,将深化行业管制体制改革和反垄断执法有机的结合起来。 Public utilities' above behavior is the main problem in regulation reform and antimonopoly law in China. Based on linear city model, this paper proved that vertical monopoly has incentives to deter new finns entry with exclusive measures. Under this circumstance, the mixing regulation institution has efficiency advantage. There are natural monopoly, behavior monopoly, and administrative monopoly, and the public utilities have special abusive behaviors and incentives. The authors point the application of antimonopoly law should take mixing regulation institution to realize harminization between w.gulation and antimonopoly.
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期82-89,共8页 Finance & Economics
基金 ※国家自然科学基金项目(70573087)和中国博士后基金项目(20060390305)
关键词 公用企业 滥用行为 混合型管制体制 public utilities abusive behavior mixing regulation institution
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Vickers,1995."Competition and Regulation in Vertically Related Markets",Review of Economic Studies 62.
  • 2Rey and Tirole,1997."A Primer on Foreclosure",Mimeo-IDEI-Tolouse,in Handbook of Industrial Organization.
  • 3拉丰 泰勒尔 胡汉辉译.电信竞争[M].北京:人民邮电出版社,2001..
  • 4于立,唐要家.所有权激励与公用企业的反竞争行为[J].财经问题研究,2006(2):33-37. 被引量:1
  • 5Brennan,1990,"Cross-subsidization and Cost Misallocation by Regulated Monopolists",Journal of Regulatory Economics,2 (1).
  • 6Hart and Tirole,1990."Vertical Integration and Market Foreclosure",Brooking papers on Economic Activity:Microeconomics.
  • 7张宇燕.国家放松管制的博弈——以中国联合通信有限公司的创建为例[J].经济研究,1995,30(6):73-80. 被引量:51
  • 8King,1999."Price Discrimination,Separation and Access:Protecting Competition or Competitors?" Australian Journal of Management 24 (1).

二级参考文献10

  • 1张宇燕.利益集团与制度非中性[J].改革,1994(2):97-105. 被引量:198
  • 2张宇燕.国家放松管制的博弈——以中国联合通信有限公司的创建为例[J].经济研究,1995,30(6):73-80. 被引量:51
  • 3泰勒尔 张维迎(译).产业组织理论[M].中国人民大学出版社,1997,8..
  • 4Beato Mas -colell,1984.The Marginal Cost Pricing as a Regulation Mechanism in Mixed Markets[J].in Marchand,Pestieau and Tulkens,eds,"The Performance of Public Enterprises",Amsterdam:North-Holland.
  • 5Fershtman,1990.The Interdependence Between Ownership Status and Market Structure:The Case of Privatization[J].Economica,(57),319 -328.
  • 6Brennan,1990.Cross -subsidization and Cost Misallocation by Regulated Monopolists[J].Journal of Regulatory Economics,2(1),37 -51.
  • 7Sappington and Sidak,2002.Incentive for Anticompetitive Behavior by Public Enterprises[R].Working paper,American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
  • 8Vickers and Yarrow.1988.Privatization:An Economic Analysis[M].Cambridge:The MIT Press.
  • 9[英]S·C·利特尔·蔡尔德(S·C·Little-child) 著,周树基.电信经济学原理[M]人民邮电出版社,1983.
  • 10刘小玄.中国转轨经济中的产权结构和市场结构——产业绩效水平的决定因素[J].经济研究,2003,38(1):21-29. 被引量:284

共引文献56

同被引文献16

引证文献2

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部