期刊文献+

正电子发射断层延迟显像在腹部和盆腔的应用 被引量:1

The role of delayed imaging of positron emission tomography on differentiation of abdominal and pelvic lesions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为明确正电子发射断层(PET)延迟显像对常规显像发现的腹部或盆腔可疑病灶的进一步诊断价值,对70例患者在注射18F-脱氧葡萄糖后约3h进行延迟显像,期间通过饮水、进食、排尿或排便等改变胃肠道及泌尿系统的生理状态。通过病理诊断或临床随访,33例诊为恶性肿瘤,37例为生理性摄取或良性病变。以延迟显像中病灶的标准摄取值降低或升高超过10%诊断良性或恶性,则灵敏度、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为51%(17/33)、62%(23/37)、57%(40/70)、81%(17/21)和85%(23/27)。故PET延迟显像对腹部和盆腔病变具有一定的鉴别诊断价值。但须注意子宫、卵巢生理性摄取可导致假阳性,而胃癌在进食撑开胃部后摄取可能会减低。 The value of delayed imaging of positron emission tomography (PET) was assessed by analyzing 70 patients with suspicious abdominal or pelvic lesions on routine whole-body studies. The delayed imaging was performed nearly 3 hours after injection of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) , and before that, the patients were suggested to drink water, take food, urinate, and even defecate to change the physiological status of gastrointestinal system and urinary System. Thirty-three cases were finally proved as malignancies, including cervical or ovarian cancers ( 13 ) , gastric cancer ( 10 ), colorectal carcinoma (4), and others (6) by pathology and/or clinical follow-up ; thirty-seven were diagnosed as physiological or benign uptake, including physiological uterine or ovarian uptake (18), regional bowel uptake (8), regional urine retention (7), and others (4). In delayed imaging, the standardized uptake value (SUV) of the lesions increased more than 10% in 21 cases, and the positive predictive value for malignancy was 81% (17/21). The 4 pseudo-positive cases came from the physiological uptakes of uterus or ovaries, which were related to menstrual cycle and could be excluded by correlating with other imaging modalities, such as ultrasonography. The SUV decreased more than 10% in 27 cases, and the negative predictive value was 85% (23/27). Although 3 cases of gastric cancer also had decreased uptake for more than 10%, the lesions were actually much more prominent compared to the distended normal gastric wall after taking food. In conclusion, delayed imaging of FDG PET benefited the differentiation of intense-uptake lesions at abdomen or pelvis.
机构地区 中国医学科学院
出处 《现代仪器》 2007年第1期44-46,52,共4页 Modern Instruments
关键词 正电子发射断层显像(PET) 延迟显像 肿瘤 理性摄取 鉴别诊断 Positron emission tomography Delayed imaging Neoplasm Physiological uptake Differentiationdiagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献40

  • 1朱朝晖.PET-CT技术的发展现状与展望[J].现代仪器,2004,10(4):6-11. 被引量:30
  • 2李家敏,孙启银,杨乃明,王明芳,黄术林,张登胜,赵军,孙爱君,李娜,黄少勇.^(18)F-FDG PET显像鉴别肺部单发肿块性质及肺癌分期的价值[J].中华核医学杂志,1997,17(2):77-79. 被引量:27
  • 3Miraldi F,Vesselle H,Faulhaber P,er al.Elimination lf artifactal accumulation lf FDG in PET imaging of colorectal cancer[J].Clin Nucl Med,1998,23:3
  • 4Zhuang H,Pourdehnad M,Lambright ES,et al.Dual time point18F-FDG PET imaging for differentiating malignant from inflammatory processes[J].J Nucl Med 2001,42(9):1412
  • 5Bar-Shalom R,Valdivia AY,Blaufox MD.PET imaging in oncology[J].Semin Nucl Med 2000,30(3):150
  • 6Engel H,Steinert H,Buck A,et al.Whole-body PET;physiological and artifactual fluorodeoxyhlucose accumulations[J].Nucl Med,1996,37:441
  • 7Whiteford MH,Whiteford HM,Yee LF,et al.Usefulness of FDG-PET scan in the assessment of suspected metastatic or recurrent adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum[J].Dis colon Rectum 2000,43(6):759-67;discussion 767
  • 8第三届临床蛋白指纹图谱技术研讨会.http://www.tech-ex.com/equipment/news/ mainland/00353263.html (2006年4月15日)
  • 9Martinelli M,Townsend D,Meltzer C,et al.Survey of results of whole body imaging using PET/CT at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center PET Facility.Clin Positron imaging.2000,3:161
  • 10Kluetz PG,Meltzer C,Villemagne V,et al.Combined PET/CT imaging in oncology:Impact on patient management.Clinical Positron imaging.2000,3:223~230

共引文献126

同被引文献21

  • 1朱朝晖.PET/CT在肿瘤学中的应用[J].现代仪器,2006,12(4):15-17. 被引量:17
  • 2朱朝晖,程午樱,程欣,党永红.正电子发射断层显像中子宫和卵巢生理性摄取的特点[J].中国医学科学院学报,2007,29(1):124-129. 被引量:3
  • 3Belhocine T,Spaepen K,Dusart M,et al.^18F-FDG PET inoncology:The best and the wont[J].Int J Oncol,2006,28(5):1249.
  • 4潘中允.肿瘤F-FDG PET显像的原理、方法和特点[M].见:潘中允主编.PET诊断学.北京:人民卫生出版社,2005,310.
  • 5Musto A,Rampin L,Nauni C,et al.Present and future of PET and PET/CT in gynecologic malignancies[J].Eur J Radiol,2010,[Epub ahead of print].
  • 6Harry VN.Novel imaging techniques as response biomarkers in cervical cancer[J].Gynecol Oncol,2010,116(2):253.
  • 7Unger JB,Lilien DL,Caldito G,et al.The prognostic value of pretreatment 2-[^18F]-fluom-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography scan in women with cervical cancer[J].Int J Gynecol Cancer,2007,17(5):1062.
  • 8shon S,Hoskin P,WongW.Ovulation and increased FDGuptake on PET:Potential for a false positive result[J].Clin Nucl Med,2005,30(10):70.
  • 9Abouzied MM,Crawford ES,Nabi HA.^18 F-FDG imaging:Pitfalls and artifacts[J].J Nucl Med Technol,2005,33(3):145.
  • 10De Gaetano AM,Calcagni ML,Rufini V,et al.Imaging of gynecologic malignancies with FDG PET-CT:Case examples,physiologic activity,and pitfalls[J].Abdom Imaging,2009,34(6):696.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部