期刊文献+

心理契约破坏感对员工工作态度和行为的影响 被引量:57

The Impact of Psychological Contract Breach on the Work-Related Attitude and Behavior of Employees
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对398名企业员工的问卷调查,探讨了组织支持感(POS)和领导—部属交换(LMX)在心理契约破坏感对员工工作态度和行为影响中的中介作用。结果表明(1)POS在心理契约破坏感与员工工作态度(组织认同和留职意愿)的关系中起中介作用,但POS只能部分中介心理契约破坏感与留职意愿的关系。(2)LMX在心理契约破坏感与员工组织公民行为(利他行为、个人主动性、人际和谐和保护公司资源)间起完全中介作用。(3)LMX对员工的工作态度(留职意愿和组织认同)不具有直接的影响作用,它主要是通过POS的中介对其产生间接的影响。 Introduction The psychological contract has been viewed as an explanatory framework for understanding the employment relationship, and is regarded by some researchers as central to the understanding of employee attitudes and behaviors. Despite the importance ascribed to this concept, it remains theoretically underdeveloped and has received limited empirical attention. Method Using a sample of 398 employees from 32 firms, the present study examined whether perceived organizational support (POS) and leader-member exchange (LMX) mediate the relationship between psychological contract breach and its outcomes by applying the structural equation modeling analysis. Results Results indicated that perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange mediate the relationship between psychological contract breach and its outcomes'. (1) POS was found to fully mediate the relationship between psychological contract breach and organizational identification; POS only partially mediates the relationship between psychological contract breach and intention to remain. (2) LMX was found to mediate the relationship between psychological contract breach and orgazational citizenship behavior. (3) POS fully mediates the relationship between LMX and work-related attitudes, including intention to remain and organizational identification. Conclusions POS and LMX mediate the relationship between psychological contract breach and employees' work-related outcomes. Results highlight the importance of POS and LMX in enhancing the understanding of the links between psychological contract breach and its work-related outcome.
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期155-162,共8页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 江西省高校人文社会科学研究立项项目(编号:XL0603)。
关键词 组织支持感 领导-部属交换 心理契约破坏感 perceived organizational support, leader-member exchange, psychological contract breach.
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

  • 1Kissler G D.The new employment contract.Human Resource Management,1994,33:335 ~352
  • 2Parks J M,Kidder D L.Till death us do part…:changing work relationships in the 1990s'.In:Cooper C L,Rousseau D M.(Eds),Trends in Organization Behavior,New York:Wiley,1994.112 ~133
  • 3Csoka L S.A new employer-employee contract? Employment Relations Today,1995,22:21 ~31
  • 4Argyris C.Understanding Organization Behavior.London:Tavistock Publication,1960
  • 5Levinson H,Price C R,Manden K J,et al.Men,management and mental health.Cambridge:Harvard University Press,1962
  • 6Rousseau D M.Psychological and implied contracts in organizations.Employee responsibilities and rights Journal,1989,2:121 ~138
  • 7Rousseau D M.Psychological contract in organizations:Understanding written and unwritten agreements,Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage,1995
  • 8Morrison E W,Robinson S L.When employees feel betrayed:A Model of how psychological contract violation develops.Academy of management Review,1997,22:226 ~ 56
  • 9Turnley W H,Feldman D C.The impact of psychological contract violations on exit,voice,loyalty and neglect,Human Relations,1999,55:895 ~ 922
  • 10Lester S W,Turnley W H,Bloodgood J M,et al.Not Seeing Eye to eye:differences in supervisor and subordinate perceptions of and attributions for psychological contract breach.Journal of Organizational Behavior,2002,23:39 ~56

二级参考文献30

  • 1[1]Tucker L R, Lewis C. The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1973, 38: 1~10
  • 2[2]Steiger J H, Lind J M. Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Psychometrika Society Meeting, IowaCity, May, 1980
  • 3[3]Bentler P M, Bonett D G. Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 1980, 88: 588~ 606
  • 4[4]Bentler P M. Comparative fit indices in structural models. Psychological Bulletin,1990, 107: 238~ 246
  • 5[5]McDonald R P, Marsh H W. Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness-of-fit. Psychological Bulletin, 1990,107: 247~ 255
  • 6[6]Marsh H W, Balla J R, Hau K T. An evaluation of incremental fit indices: A clarification of mathematical and empirical processes. In: Marcoulides G A, Schumacker R E eds. Advanced structural equation modeling techniques. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1996. 315~ 353
  • 7[7]Browne M W, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen K A, Long J S eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993. 136~ 162
  • 8[8]Joreskog K G, Srbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, 1993
  • 9[9]Hu L, Bentler P M. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 1998, 3: 424~ 453
  • 10[10]Hu L, Bentler P M. Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, 6: 1~ 55

共引文献1262

同被引文献802

引证文献57

二级引证文献389

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部