期刊文献+

程序公正感及其在绩效评估中的作用 被引量:2

Procedural Justice Perceptions and Its Function in Performance Appraisal
下载PDF
导出
摘要 绩效评估一直是各类组织人力资源管理部门最重要的职能之一,在组织人力资源的开发和管理中具有强大的反馈、控制、激励和开发功能。从总体来说,组织公正感是判断绩效评估有效性的衡量标准之一。而对组织成员个人而言,这种对资源分配过程是否公正的主观感受就是程序公正感。研究程序公正感对正确实施组织绩效评估有重要启示。 As one of the most important functions of the HRM departments in any organization, performance appraisal has the function to reflect, control, stimulate and explore in the development and management of human resource. In general, organizational justice is one criterion to judge the validity of performance appraisal. To individuals, the subjective perception to whether the resource distribution process is fair is procedural justice perception, the study of which will have great enlightenment on the correct implementation of performance appraisal.
作者 马超 吕政宝
出处 《沈阳师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 2007年第1期14-17,共4页 Journal of Shenyang Normal University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 绩效评估 程序公正感 满意感 performance appraisal procedural justice perceptions satisfaction
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hyung-Ryong Lee.An Empirical Study of Organizational Justice as a Mediator of the Relationships among Leader-Member Exchange and Job Satisfaction,Organizational Commitment,and Turnover Intentions in the Lodging Industry[M].Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Hospitality and Tourism Management,2000:8.
  • 2Folger R.Distributive and procedural justice:combined impact of "voice" and improvement on experienced inequity[J].Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1977,35:108-119.
  • 3Greenberg J.Organizational justice:Yesterday,today,and tomorrow[J].Journal of Management,1990,16:399-432.
  • 4Feldman J M.Beyond attribution theory:Cognitive processes in performance appraisal[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1981,66:127-148.
  • 5Silverman S B.& Wexley K N.Reaction of employees to performance appraisal interviews as a function of their participation in rating scale development[J].Personnel Psychology,1984,37:703-710.
  • 6Folger R.,Konovsky M A.& Cropanzano R.A due process metaphor for performance appraisal.B M.Staw & L L.Cummings (Eds.)[J].Research in organizational behavior.Greenwich CT:JAI Press,1992,14:129-177.
  • 7Taylor M S.,Tracy K B.,Renard M K.,Harrison J K.& Carroll S J.Due process in performance appraisal:a quasi-experiment in procedural justice[J].Administrative Science Quarterly,1994,40:495-523.
  • 8Berrin Erdogan.Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisal[J].Human Resource Management Review,2002,12:555-578.
  • 9Steven L.Blade,Tom R.Tyler.What constitutes fairness in work settings? A four-component model of procedural justice[J].Human Resource Management Review,2003,13:107-126.
  • 10Douglas H.Flint.The role of organizational justice in multi-source performance appraisal:theory-based applications and directions for research[J].Human Resource Management Review,1999,9(1):1-20.

同被引文献34

  • 1王小慧,金瑜.情绪智力技能问卷(中文版)试用报告[J].心理科学,2003,26(1):136-139. 被引量:16
  • 2戴维·米勒.社会正义原则[M].应奇译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2002.P102.
  • 3LANDY, F.J, FARR, J.L.Performance rating [ J ] .Psychological Bulletin, 1980(87) : 72-107.
  • 4SALOVEY P, MAYER J.D.Emotional Intelligence [ J ] .Ima gination,Cognition and Personality, 1990(9): 185-211.
  • 5ADAMS, J.S.Toward an understanding of inequity [ J ] .Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963(67) : 422-436.
  • 6THIBAUT, J, WALKER, L.Procedural justice : a psychological analysis [ M ] .Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum, 1975.
  • 7BIES, R.J, MOAG, J.F.Interactional justice : communication criteria of fairness [ J ] .Research on Negotiations in Organizations. 1986(1): 43-55.
  • 8CROPANZANO, R.GREENBERG, J.Progress in organizational Justice.In: I.T.Robertson And C.L.Cooper(Eds.).Tunne-li ng Through the Maze,1997.
  • 9ERDOGAN, B.Antecedents and consequences of justice perceptions in performance appraisals [ J ] .Human Resource Management Review, 2002(12) : 555-578.
  • 10FOLGER, R, KONOVSKY, M.A.Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions [ J ] .Academy of Management Journal, 1989(32): 115-130.

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部