瑞文与韦氏智力测试用于学习成绩落后儿童的比较

Comparison between WISC-R and Raven's intelligence tests for children fell behind at school achivement.

【目的】探讨瑞文标准推理测验与韦氏智力结果的相关性,以便临床能合理应用。【方法】对467例因“学习困难成绩落后”儿童进行上述两项测试,并按韦氏智商结果分智力正常组、智力不平衡组、智力低下组,比较组间相关性和二者分因子之间的相关性。【结果】瑞文商数在正常组和不平衡组之间无差异性,基本接近(P>0.05),瑞文与韦氏商数差正常组9.66±19.41,不平衡组10.86±19.18,智力低下组18.63±14.36,智力低者差数大(P<0.01),瑞文分因子A、B、E与韦氏智力测验内容相关性高,瑞文商数更能反映韦氏测试中的操作智商数,但不能提示智力结构不平衡。韦氏的算术分因子与瑞文相关性最大。【结论】瑞文与韦氏之间有相关性,由于瑞文测试的片面性,特别是智力中下、边界、轻度低下水平的儿童,更易导致对学习困难病因的误诊和漏诊,瑞文测试亦不适合作为临床研究的分组工具。

[Objective] To study the relation of intelligence quotient （IQ） between WISC-CR and Raven＇s Standard Progressive Matrices Test（RSPMT）. [Methods] Test the 467 children, who fell behind learning achievement, have come to our health department for psychotherapy. The normal groups, unbalanced groups and groups of mental retardation were divided with above two IQ tests,compared the relevance during groups in the factors of the two tests. [Results] For RSPMT＇S IQ, there＇s no difference between normal groups and unbalanced groups（P2〉 0. 05）, while for normal group, the difference between WISC-CR and RSPMT was 9.66 ± 19.41 ;for unbalanced group 10.86 ± 19.18 and for the group of low mental retardation 18.63± 14. a6. A big difference（P〈0.01）existsed. For the group of poor mental retardation and high relevance between RSPMT factors of A,B,E and WISC CR testing content existsed. RSPMT＇S IQ could better reflect practical IQ displayed in WISC-CR, but it didn＇t mean unbalanced intelligence. But the result reflected a closer relevance between WISC-CR arithmatic factors and RSPMT. [Conclusions] There＇s relevance between WISC and RSPMT. Because of the one-sidedness reflected in RSPMT,especially for children whose IQ were under 85. So RSPMT is unfit to be used as a way of clinical research.