摘要
无论是刑法类推解释、扩张解释还是限制解释,都不是在刑法规定的字面意义上所进行的解释,不能保障国民的预测可能性,因而均应当区分为有利于行为人的类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释和不利于行为人的类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释。前者有利于人权保障,应当允许;而后者不利于人权保障,应当禁止。
Analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation of criminal law are not letter explanations of provisions of criminal law, which can not ensure forecast possibility of national people. Therefore, beneficial analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation to people and harmful analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation for people should be distinguished. The former ought to be allowed because it is beneficial to safeguarding human rights and the latter ought to be forbidden because it is harmful for safeguarding human rights.
出处
《政法论丛》
2007年第1期38-43,共6页
Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词
类推解释
扩张解释
限制解释
人权保障
实现
analogy explanation
dilative explanation
restrictive explanation
safeguarding human rights
realization