期刊文献+

刑法解释方法与人权保障的实现——从类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释谈起 被引量:13

Explanation Method of Criminal Law and Realization of Safeguarding Human Rights
下载PDF
导出
摘要 无论是刑法类推解释、扩张解释还是限制解释,都不是在刑法规定的字面意义上所进行的解释,不能保障国民的预测可能性,因而均应当区分为有利于行为人的类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释和不利于行为人的类推解释、扩张解释、限制解释。前者有利于人权保障,应当允许;而后者不利于人权保障,应当禁止。 Analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation of criminal law are not letter explanations of provisions of criminal law, which can not ensure forecast possibility of national people. Therefore, beneficial analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation to people and harmful analogy explanation, dilative explanation and restrictive explanation for people should be distinguished. The former ought to be allowed because it is beneficial to safeguarding human rights and the latter ought to be forbidden because it is harmful for safeguarding human rights.
作者 彭辅顺
机构地区 湖南大学法学院
出处 《政法论丛》 2007年第1期38-43,共6页 Journal of Political Science and Law
关键词 类推解释 扩张解释 限制解释 人权保障 实现 analogy explanation dilative explanation restrictive explanation safeguarding human rights realization
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献2

  • 1董〓.司法解释论[M]中国政法大学出版社,1999.
  • 2[日]川岛武宜 著,申政武等.现代化与法[M]中国政法大学出版社,1994.

共引文献35

同被引文献150

引证文献13

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部