期刊文献+

A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of tegaserod in patients from China with chronic constipation 被引量:7

A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of tegaserod in patients from China with chronic constipation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegaserod, 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), in men and women with chronic constipation (CC) from China. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following a 2-wk treatment-free baseline period, patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod (6 mg b.i.d.) or placebo (b.i.d.) for 4 wk. An analysis of covariance with repeated measures was used to determine the overall effect of treatment for the primary efficacy variable; the change from baseline in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) during the 4-wk treatment period. Secondary efficacy endpoints included other measures of response in terms of CSBMs, and patients’ daily and weekly assessment of bowel habits. Safety was also assessed, based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs).RESULTS: A total of 607 patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod (n = 304) or placebo (n = 303). Tegaserod treatment resulted in a rapid and significant increase from baseline in the adjusted mean number of CSBMs per week over wk 1-4 compared with placebo (1.39 vs 0.91, P = 0.0002). A statistically significant difference in favor of tegaserod was also observed for a mean increase ≥ 1 CSBM/wk over wk 1-4 (47.7% vs 35.0%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0018) and for the absolute number of ≥ 3 CSBMs/wk over wk 1-4 (25.0% vs 14.5%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0021). Improvements in other symptoms of CC were also seen in the tegaserod group, including improved stool form and reduced straining. In addition, more patients in the tegaserod group reported satisfactory relief from their constipation symptoms. The frequency and severity of AEs was comparable between tegaserod and placebo groups, with the exception of a greater incidence of diarrhea in patients receiving tegaserod (3.6%) compared with placebo (1.7%).CONCLUSION: Tegaserod treatment improved multiple symptoms of CC and was associated with a favorable safety profile. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegaserod, 6 mg twice daily (b.i.d.), in men and women with chronic constipation (CC) from China. METHODS: This was a multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Following a 2-wk treatmentfree baseline period, patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod (6 mg b.i.d.) or placebo (b.i.d.) for 4 wk. An analysis of covariance with repeated measures was used to determine the overall effect of treatment for the primary efficacy variable; the change from baseline in the number of complete spontaneous bowel movements (CSBMs) during the 4-wk treatment period. Secondary efficacy endpoints included other measures of response in terms of CSBMs, and patients' daily and weekly assessment of bowel habits. Safety was also assessed, based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: A total of 607 patients were randomized to receive either tegaserod (n = 304) or placebo (n = 303). Tegaserod treatment resulted in a rapid and significant increase from baseline in the adjusted mean number of CSBMs per week over wk 1-4 compared with placebo (1.39 vs 0.91, P = 0.0002). A statistically significant difference in favor of tegaserod was also observed for a mean increase ≥ 1 CSBM/wk over wk 1-4 (47.7% vs 35.0%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0018) and for the absolute number of≥ 3 CSBMs/wk over wk 1-4 (25.0% vs 14.5%, tegaserod vs placebo, respectively, P = 0.0021). Improvements in other symptoms of CC were also seen in the tegaserod group, including improved stool form and reduced straining. In addition, more patients in the tegaserod group reported satisfactory relief from their constipation symptoms. The frequency and severity of AEs was comparable between tegaserod and placebo groups, with the exception of a greater incidence of diarrhea in patients receiving tegaserod (3.6%) compared with placebo (1.7%). CONCLUSION: Tecjaserod treatment improved multiple symptoms of CC and was associated with a favorable safety profile.
出处 《World Journal of Gastroenterology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2007年第5期732-739,共8页 世界胃肠病学杂志(英文版)
关键词 慢性便秘 替加色罗 治疗效果 安全性 随机双盲对照试验 Chronic constipation tegaserod China Complete spontaneous bowel movement Placebocontrolled Stool
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1[1]Cheng C,Chan AO,Hui WM,Lam SK.Coping strategies,illness perception,anxiety and depression of patients with idiopathic constipation:a population-based study.Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 18:319-326
  • 2[2]Brandt LJ,Prather CM,Quigley EM,Schiller LR,Schoenfeld P,Talley NJ.Systematic review on the management of chronic constipation in North America.Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100Suppl 1:S5-S21
  • 3[3]Garrigues V,Galvez C,Ortiz V,Ponce M,Nos P,Ponce J.Prevalence of constipation:agreement among several criteria and evaluation of the diagnostic accuracy of qualifying symptoms and self-reported definition in a population-based survey in Spain.Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:520-526
  • 4[4]Guo XK,Pan MY,Han G,Fang S,Lu XC,Guo H.A cluster,stratified,randomized epidemiologic survey and analysis of related factors on adult chronic constipation in Beijing area.Chin J Dig 2002; 22:637-638
  • 5[5]Lembo A,Camilleri M.Chronic constipation.N Engl J Med 2003; 349:1360-1368
  • 6[6]Norton C.Constipation in older patients:effects on quality of life.Br J Nurs 2006; 15:188-192
  • 7[7]Wald A.Pathophysiology,diagnosis and current management of chronic constipation.Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006; 3:90-100
  • 8[8]Drossman DA,Corazziari E,Talley NJ,Thompson WG,Whitehead W.Rome Ⅱ:The Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders.2nd ed.McLean,VA:Degnon Associates,2000
  • 9[9]Xing JH,Soffer EE.Adverse effects of laxatives.Dis Colon Rectum 2001; 44:1201-1209
  • 10[10]Ramkumar D,Rao SS.Efficacy and safety of traditional medical therapies for chronic constipation:systematic review.Am J Gastroenterol 2005; 100:936-971

同被引文献42

引证文献7

二级引证文献49

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部