摘要
征收及补偿问题不仅是物权法中的一个重要问题,也是一个国际法问题。我国物权法在规定征收及补偿问题时,须考虑国际社会的通常做法和我国政府对其他国家已做出的承诺。在征收补偿方面存在着国际法规则。投资协定的约束是确定的,而国际习惯法的约束则取决于各国的取舍。我国现行法律实质上未能明确征收补偿标准,而我国对外签署的投资协定则接受了“充分补偿”标准。物权法(草案)中的“合理补偿”标准并不合理。建议物权法在规定征收补偿标准时,以“充分补偿”为原则,以“另依特别规定”为补充。
Expropriation and compensation is not only an important issue in property law, but also an issue in international law. In drafting our property law, we have to put in consideration international practice and our commitments to other countries. There do exist international law regarding expropriation and compensation. The binding of international agreements is definite, while the binding of customary in- ternational law is subject the will of the country concerned. The existing laws of China in fact keep silent on compensation criteria; however, in the BITs we concluded with other countries, a ＂full compensation＂ criterion has been accepted. The ＂reasonable compensation＂ criterion presently used in the Property Law （draft） is not so reasonable, and it is suggested that an approach of ＂taking full compensation as general principle and taking special compensation as subordinate criterion＂ should be adopted.
出处
《时代法学》
2007年第1期3-8,共6页
Presentday Law Science
关键词
物权法
征收
补偿标准
property law
expropriation
compensation criteria
