期刊文献+

FCM-DNA倍体分析、AgNOR染色及hTERT、PCNA表达在良恶性胸腹水鉴别诊断中的临床意义 被引量:8

Significance of FCM-DNA Ploidy Pattern, AgNOR Counting, hTERT and PCNA Expression in Differentiating Malignant from Benign Serous Effusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 背景与目的:良恶性胸腹水的鉴别诊断仍然是临床的一大难题,本研究应用流式细胞仪(flow cytometry,FCM)-DNA倍体分析、核仁组成区嗜银蛋白(argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region,AgNOR)染色及端粒酶逆转录酶(human telomerase reverse transcriptase,hTERT)、增殖细胞核抗原(proliferating cell nuclear antigen,PCNA)的表达来探讨其对良恶性胸腹水的鉴别诊断价值。方法:选取2004年6月至2005年6月间因胸腹水就诊的患者67例,每位患者除常规胸腹水脱落细胞学检查外,还分别进行FCM-DNA倍体分析、AgNOR染色和应用免疫细胞化学SP法检测胸腹水脱落细胞hTERT和PCNA的表达状况。结果:FCM-DNA倍体分析、AgNOR染色及hTERT、PCNA的表达在良恶性胸腹水之间差异显著。上述诸指标与细胞学比较显示,AgNOR染色敏感性最高为89.1%;细胞学及hTERT和PCNA检测特异性最高,为100%;而AgNOR染色及hTERT检测准确率最高,为89.6%。联合检测发现细胞学联合hTERT检测敏感性提高至91.3%(42/46)。结论:DNA异倍体、hTERT和PCNA的表达及AgNOR颗粒数增多均是恶性胸腹水的特征,可作为胸腹水脱落细胞学检查的重要辅助手段,而细胞学联合hTERT免疫细胞化学检测可提高单纯细胞学的阳性率。 BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE. Differentiating malignant from benign serous effusion is still a difficulty in clinic at present. This study was to explore the clinical value of flow cytometry (FCM)-DNA ploidy, argyrophilic nucleolar organizer region (AgNOR) staining, human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression in differentiating malignant from benign serous effusion, METHODS, Sixty-seven patients with serous effusion, treated in People's Hospital of Huaibei City from Jun. 2004 to Jun. 2005, were selected. Besides routine exfoliated cytology examination, FCM-DNA ploidy analysis and AgNOR staining was performed, hTERT and PCNA expression were detected by SP immunocytology. RESULTS, There were significant differences in FCM-DNA ploidy, AgNOR staining, hTERT and PCNA expression between malignant and benign serous effusion. Compared with exfoliated cytology, the sensitivity of AgNOR staining was the highest (89.1%), the specificity of cytology, hTERT and PCNA expression was the highest (100%), and the accuracy of AgNOR staining and hTERT expression was the highest (89.6%). According to combination examination, the sensitivity was increased to 91.3% through combining cytology with hTERT expression. CONCLUSION, DNA aneuploidy, hTERT and PCNA expression and AgNOR counting increase are correlated to malignant serous effusion, and can be important auxiliary measures for serous cytology.
出处 《癌症》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期178-182,共5页 Chinese Journal of Cancer
基金 淮北市科技计划项目(No.040143)~~
关键词 肿瘤 恶性腹水 FCM—DNA倍体分析 AGNOR HTERT PCNA 诊断 Neoplasm Malignant serous effusion FCM-DNA ploidy analysis AgNOR Human telomerase reverse transcriptase Proliferating cell nuclear antigen Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1Miura N, Shiota G, Nakagawa T, et al. Sensitive detection of human telomerase reverse transcriptase mRNA in the serum of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Oncology, 2003,64(4): 430-434.
  • 2许良中.关于核仁组成区研究工作的标准化方案[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1996,18:69-69.
  • 3Motherby H, Nadjari B, Remmerbach T. Static DNA cytometry as a diagnostic aid in effusion cytology [J]. Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 1998,20(3): 162-168.
  • 4Mohanty S K, Dey P, Rana P. Manual and automated AgNOR count in differentiating reactive mesothelial from metastatic malignant cells in serous effusions [J]. Anal Quant Cytol Histol, 2003,25 (5): 273-276.
  • 5张智慧,李中林,潘秦镜,孙耘田,刘树范.AgNOR定量分析在胸腹水及针吸细胞学辅助诊断中的意义[J].诊断病理学杂志,2003,10(1):27-29. 被引量:14
  • 6Dejmek A, Yahata N, Ohyashike K, et al. In situ telomerase activity in pleural effusions: a prominsing marker for malignancy [J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2001,24(1): 11-15
  • 7Saldanha S N, Andrew L G, Tollefsbol T O. Analysis of telomerase activity and detection of its catalytic subunit,hTERT [J]. Anal Biochem, 2003,315(1): 1-21.
  • 8Hiroi S, Nakanishi K, Kawai T. Expressions of human telomerase mRNA component (hTERC) and telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) mRNA in effusion cytology[J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2003,29(4) :212-216.
  • 9张焜和,付曲波,操风,祝金泉,陈江,吕农华,朱萱,王崇文.浆膜腔积液脱落细胞端粒酶逆转录酶mRNA检测及其意义[J].中华消化杂志,2005,25(2):116-118. 被引量:10

二级参考文献16

  • 1许良中.关于核仁组成区研究工作的标准化方案[J].中华肿瘤杂志,1993,15(5):380-380.
  • 2[1]Mezger J, Stotzer O, Schilli G et al. Identification of carcinoma cells in ascitic and pleural fluid. Comparison of four panepithelial antigens with carcinoembryonic antigen. Acta Cytol, 1992,36:75
  • 3[2]Smith R, Crocker J. Evaluation of nucleoar organizer region-associated proteins in breast malignancy. Histopathology, 1988,12:113
  • 4[3]Williams MA, Kleinschmidt JA, Krohne G et al.Argyrophilic nucleolar and nucleolar proteins of xenopus laevis oocytes identified by gel electrophroresis. Exp cell RES, 1982,137: 341
  • 5[5]Schee U, Benevente R. Functional and dynamic aspects of the mammalian nucleos. Bioessays, 1990,12:14
  • 6[6]Sujathan K, Kannan S,Pillai KR et al . Significance of AgNOR count in differentiating malignant cells from reactive mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Acta Cytol, 1996,40:724
  • 7[7]Schwarzacher RT, Kraemer PM, Cram LS. Spontaneous in vitro neoplastic evoluation of cultured chinese hamster cells: Nucleolus organizing region activity. Cancer Genet Cytogenet, 1988,35:119
  • 8[8]Underwood JC,Giri DD.Nucleolar organizer regions as diagnostic discriminants for malignancy. J Pathol, 1988,155:95
  • 9[9]Zatsepina O,Hozak P, Babajanayan D et al . Quantitative ultrastrctural study of nucleolus-organizing regions at some stages of the cell cycle. Biol Cell, 1988,62:211
  • 10Vonderheide RH. Te lomerase as a universal tumor-associated antigen for cancer immunotherapy. Oncogene, 2002,21: 674-679.

共引文献26

同被引文献73

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部