摘要
目的探讨 CD_(45)抗体标记+碘化丙啶(PI)染色法(简称CD_(45)+PI法)进行 DNA 倍体分析对提高恶性胸腔积液检出率的意义。方法对28例临床确诊为肿瘤患者的恶性胸腔积液及20例结核病患者的胸腔积液,分别采用3种方法进行分析:(1)细胞形态学检查法(简称形态法);(2)PJ染色法,PI 染色后进行流式 DNA 倍体分析(简称 PI 法);(3)CD_(45)+PI 法,即先用 CD_(45)抗体标记细胞表面抗原,再用PI染色进行流式 DNA 倍体分析。比较3种方法的敏感度、特异度和准确性;比较异倍体细胞含量较低(≤3.64%)的标本中,PI 法和 CD_(45)+PI 法进行 DNA 倍体分析的 DNA 指数(DI)值差异。结果 CD_(45)+PI 法的敏感度为89%高于形态法及普通 PI 法的36%和71%,且特异度(95%)较PI 法(79%)高,在3种方法中 CD_(45)^+PI 法准确性最高,为92%。对肿瘤细胞含量较低,异倍体细胞较少的标本,PI 法分析 DI 值为正常;而用CD_(45)+PI 法分析 DI 值却可以检出肿瘤异倍体。结论 CD_(45)+PI 法进行 DNA 倍体分析较之普通 PI 法可以检测到更低含量的异倍体细胞,有助于提高良恶性胸腔积液的鉴别诊断水平。
Objective To explore the diagnostic value of CD45 and PI staining short for CD45 + PI method) in identifying malignant from benign pleural effusion by DNA analysis. Methods Check the malignant pleural effusion in patients with cancer and benign pleural effusion in patients with tuberculosis by three methods: ( 1 )Microscope method, (2)PI staining method: Cell from pleural effusion stained with PI for DNA cycle analysis of flow cytometry (short for PI method), (3) CD45 +PI method,which is to stain the cell with CD45 first and PI later for DNA cycle analysis of flow cytometry. Compare three methods in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy; Compare PI method and CD45 + PI method for DNA analysis of flow cytometry in samples with low aneuploidy content (≤3.64% of all). Results CD45 + PI method was more sensitive than microscope method or conventional PI method, and the sensitivities were 89%, 36%, and 71%, respectively. CD45 + PI method was more specifici than PI method,and the specificities were 95% and 79% respectively. CD45 +PI method has shown the best accuracy (92%)among the three methods. In 5 samples with low aneuploidy content,they were normal when analyzed by PI method but abnormal with aneuploidy by CD45 + PI method. Conclusion CD45 + PI method can detect lower content of aneuploidy than the conventional PI method, thus can be used to improve the diagnosis level of malignant from benign pleural effusion.
出处
《中华检验医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2007年第2期161-163,共3页
Chinese Journal of Laboratory Medicine