期刊文献+

林纾《评选船山史论》考述 被引量:2

Textual Research and Comments on Selective Criticism on Chuanshan's Historical Essays by Lin Shu
下载PDF
导出
摘要 林纾《评选船山史论》(以下简称《史论》),堪为文史评论之范典。林纾不仅深得船山之学,善于阐精补义,开掘船山之微言大义,亦自成一家之言。其言或补船山所未及,或讥切时事,读之亦可籍识畏廬忧慨之同深。林纾作为文学家、翻译家历来为人们所熟识,而作为古文家,其《史论》至今尚未进入文学及史学家们之研究视阈,又因其文辞艰深、典故繁多,而鲜有其研究者,本文将以《史论》为对象,对其论述特点及其方法、内容考述之。 Lin Shu has set a real good example for historical criticism by his book Selective Criticism on Chuanshan's Historical Essays (hereafter referred to as Historical Essays). His understanding of Chuanshan's historical theory is profound and far - reaching; his elaboration and supplement are incisive and adequate, discovering Chuanshan's great academic views and theoretical essences put in a simple and concise language. And his ideas and criticisms are original and theoretically systematic, either adding what has been unsaid by Chuanshan or satirizing current events, full of deep worries and concerns between the lines. As a man of letters and translation, Lin Shu is well known to all generations of people. As an expert in ancient prose, however, he has not yet been deeply involved in the study of literary men and historians in that his book is hard to understand and inclusive of a world of classical allusions. This paper discusses the content, feature and research method concerning the book.
作者 田若虹
出处 《中国文学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期74-76,共3页 Research of Chinese Literature
关键词 林纾 船山 史论 考述 Lin Shu Chuanshan historical criticism textual research comment
  • 相关文献

同被引文献5

  • 1王夫之.读通鉴论[M]//船山全书(第10册).长沙:岳麓书社.2011.
  • 2李焯然. 历史的记忆与再诠释:林纾的《评选船山史论》[C]//四川大学历史文化学院,四川大学中国藏学研究所,香港城市大学中国文化中心. 文化传承与历史记忆学术研讨会论文集. 四川:成都,2007.
  • 3林纾. 评选船山史论[M]. 上海:商务印书馆,1922.
  • 4岳麓书社编. 船山全书第16册[M]. 长沙:岳麓书社,2011.
  • 5郑州大学嵇文甫文集编辑组. 嵇文甫文集(下)[M]. 郑州:河南人民出版社,1990:524-541.

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部