期刊文献+

公司治理中多重委托代理悖论与制度辅助——兼与冯根福商榷 被引量:4

Multi Principal-agents Paradox in Corporate Governance and the Institutional Complementarity
原文传递
导出
摘要 在股权高度集中或相对集中的上市公司,既要保障股东对经营者的监督效率,又要兼顾中小股东的利益保护是“鱼与熊掌”,内控机制无法单独解决这个两难问题,需要外部制度约束来作保障。在公司内部治理中,如果单重委托代理无法形成有效的激励和信息传递,那么多重委托代理必定是无效的。揭示了多重委托代理在机制设计中的悖论性,并从制度层面弥补了内控机制的局限性,提出了完善中国上市公司治理需要建立政府代理声誉、国家执法声誉和企业信息披露声誉,以及中小股东与大股东之间的良性信息传递机制。 This paper proved that keeping the monitor efficiency as well as the minority shareholders' benefit is all'cult from the view of principal effectiveness. Meanwhile we find that individual internal control systems are inadequacy, and the external control systems are remedy. However, in order to elude the external control systems' locclization, this paper brings forward three reputations: reputation of government principal, reputation of law- executing and reputation of enterprise' information issuance, at the same time, to build a benitro signaling mechanism between eontrolling shareholders and minority shareholders is nceessarv.
作者 战勇 严太华
出处 《财经科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第3期97-104,共8页 Finance & Economics
关键词 多重委托代理 委托效力 过度寻租 multi- Principal- agents principal efficacy quasi- rent
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Fama Eugene F.and Jensen Michael C.,1983,' Agency problems and residual claims'.Jesse Isidor Straus Professor of Business Administration.
  • 2La Porta R.,Lopez-de-Silanes F.,and Shleifer A,1999,' Corporate Ownership around the World',Journal of Finance,Vol.54,No.2.
  • 3Jensen,Michael and William Meckling,1976,'Theory of the Firm:Managerial Behavior,Agency Costs and Ownership Structure',Journal of Financial Economics.Vol.3.No.4.P.05-360,October.
  • 4Laffont,Jean-Jacques and David Martimort,2002,the Theory of Incentives:The Principal-Agent Model,Princeton University Press.
  • 5Shleifer,A.and VishnyR.,1997,'ASurvey of Corporate Governance',Journal of Finance,Vol.52,No.2.
  • 6Jensen,Michael C.,'The Modern Industrial Revolution,Exit,and the Failure of Internal Control Systems'.The Jotrnal of Finance (July 1993).
  • 7冯根福.双重委托代理理论:上市公司治理的另一种分析框架——兼论进一步完善中国上市公司治理的新思路[J].经济研究,2004,39(12):16-25. 被引量:313
  • 8田国强.经济机制理论:信息效率与激励机制设计[J].经济学(季刊),2003,2(2):271-308. 被引量:136
  • 9Allen F.,J.Qian,and M.Qian,2005,Law,Finance and economic growth in China.Journal of Financial Economics,77.
  • 10战勇.企业控制者寻租紧缩与政府最优执法信号选择[C].2006年第6届中国制度经济学年会论文集卷2.

二级参考文献19

  • 1青木昌彦 见胡鞍钢 胡光宇编.2002《公司治理的比较制度分析》[A].见胡鞍钢,胡光宇编.《公司治理中外比较》[C].北京新华出版社,2004年版..
  • 2泰勒尔1988.《产业组织理论》[M].北京中国人民大学出版社,1997年版..
  • 3因内恩·马克—斯达德勒 丁·大卫·佩雷斯—卡斯特里罗1994.《信息经济学引论:激励与合约》[M].上海财经大学出版社,2004年版..
  • 4Come, Ronald, 1937, The Nature of the Finn, Economics 4, 386-405.
  • 5Claessens,S, S Djankov and L H P Lang, 2000, "The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics, 58,81- 112.
  • 6Faccio, M and L H P Lang , 2002,"The Ultimate Ownership of Western European Corporations", Journal of Financial Economics 65, 365-396.
  • 7Fama,Eugence, and Michael Jensen, 1983a, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-325.
  • 8Fama,Eugence, and Michael Jensen, 1983b, Agency Problems and Residuals Claims, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 327-349.
  • 9Franks, Julian , and Colin Mayer, 1994, The Ownership and Control of German Corporation, Manuscript, London Business School.
  • 10OECD, 2001, Corporate Governance in Asia, PP. 7- 10.

共引文献447

引证文献4

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部