期刊文献+

DHPLC与ABI377系统的微卫星检测效果比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Detecting Microsatellite Polymorphism by Using DHPLC and ABI377
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用猪SCAU-LL资源群,根据猪USDA-MARC2.0连锁图谱,选取4号染色体上微卫星标记SW 1678,用变性高效液相色谱(DHPLC)系统和AB I377系统分析了F2代64个个体的微卫星多态性,比较了这2个分析系统在进行微卫星分型中的效率和利弊.2个系统检测到57个样品的基因型相同,有相同的2个样品未检测到产物.另外有3个样品,DHPLC检测出基因型,AB I377未检测到,有2个样品AB I377检测出基因型,而DHPLC未检测到.2个系统检测微卫星多态性的相同率达92.2%,DHPLC未检出率6.3%,AB I377未检出率7.8%,2个系统检测的灵敏度和准确度基本接近,但是DHPLC的检测成本低于AB I377的检测成本. Based on pig linkage map of USDA-MARC2.0, the SW1678 microsatellite marker on SSCA was chosen for genotyping 64 F2 pig samples of the SCAU-LL reference population. The efficiency and deficiency of detecting microsatellite polymorphisms were compared by WAVE nucleotide fragment analysis system (denaturing high performance liquid chromatography, DHPLC) and ABI377 DNA sequencer. Out of 64 individuals, 57 were detected genotype and 2 were missed by both systems, 3 were only detected by DHPLC, and 2 only by ABI377. The results showed the coincidence of detection was 92.2% for the two systems, while failure in detection was 6.3% for DHPLC and 7.8% for ABI377. The sensitivity and accuracy were similar for both systems, but the testing cost was lower for DHPLC than for ABI377.
出处 《华南农业大学学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2007年第1期96-99,共4页 Journal of South China Agricultural University
基金 国家重点基础研究发展计划"973"项目(2004CB117506) 国家自然科学基金(30300249) 农业部948项目(2003-Z91)
关键词 微卫星标记 变性高效液相色谱(DHPLC) ABI377 pig microsatellite marker denaturing high performance hquid chromatography ( DHPLC ) ABI377
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1KNOTT S A,NYSTROM P E,ANDERSSON-EKLUND L,et al.Approaches to interval mapping of QTL in a multigeneration pedigree:the example of porcine chromosome 4[J].Animal Genetics,2002,33:26-32.
  • 2郭晓令,Looft Christian,Reinsch Norbert,Kalm Ernst.用商品群作为参考系构建猪的微卫星连锁图谱[J].Acta Genetica Sinica,2003,30(7):653-656. 被引量:5
  • 3OEFNER P J,UNDERHILL P A.Comparative DNA sequencing by denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC)[J].Am J Hum Genet,1995,57:266.
  • 4李加琪,刘小红,王翀,陈赞谋,吴秋豪,张细权,刘德武,陈瑶生.长蓝猪QTL定位资源群建立及其遗传分析[J].Acta Genetica Sinica,2004,31(12):1361-1368. 被引量:12
  • 5ARNOLD N,GROSS E,SCHWARZ-BOEGER U,et al.A highly sensitive,fast and economical technique for mutation analysis in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers[J].Hum Mutat,1999,14:333.
  • 6SKOPEK T R,GLAAB W E,MONROE J J,et al.Analysis of sequence alterations in a defined DNA region:comparison of temperature-modulated heteroduplex analysis and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis[J].Mutat Res,1999,430:13.
  • 7COTTON R G H,BRAY P J.Using CCM and DHPLC to detect mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor in atherosclerosis:a comparison[J].J Biochem Bioph Meth,2001,47:91.
  • 8CHOY Y S,DABORA S L,HALL F,et al.Superiority of denaturing high performance liquid chromatography over single-stranded conformation and conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for mutation detection in TSC2[J].Ann Hum Genet,1999,63:383.
  • 9叶建伟,丁洁.变性高效液相色谱分析的技术特征及其应用[J].肾脏病与透析肾移植杂志,2003,12(2):197-200. 被引量:14

二级参考文献38

  • 1Hurtle W, Shoemaker D, Henchal E et al. Denaturing HPLC for identifying bacteria. Biotechniques, 2002, 33 : 386.
  • 2Gallo A,Thomson E, Brindle J et al. Micro-processing events in mRNAs identified by DHPL analysis.Nucleic Acids Res,2002,30:3945.
  • 3Matin MM, Andrews PW, Hornby DP. Multidimensional differential dislay via ion-pair reversed-phase denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. Anal Biochem, 2002,304:47.
  • 4Oefner PJ, Underhill PA. Comparative DNA sequencing by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography( DHPLC ). Am J Hum Genet,1995,57(Suppl) : A266.
  • 5Jones AC, Austin J, Hansen N et al. Optimal temperature selection for mutation detection by denaturing HPLC and comparison to single-stranded conformation polymorphism and heteroduplex analysis. Clin Chem, 1999,45:1133.
  • 6Nickerson ML,Warren MB,Zhar B et al. Random mutagenesis-PCR to introduce alterations into defined DNA sequences for validation of SNP and mutation detection methods. Hum Mutat, 2001,17: 210.
  • 7Arnold N, Gross E, Schwarz-Boeger U et al.A highly sensitive, fast and economical technique for mutation analysis in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers.Hum Murat, 1999,14:333.
  • 8Skopek TR,Glaab WE,Monroe JJ et al. Analysis of sequence alterations in a defined DNA region:comparison of temperature-modulated heteroduplex analysis and denatureing gradient gel electrophoresis. Mutat Res,1999,430:13.
  • 9Cotton RG, Bray PJ. Using CCM and DHPLC to detect mutations in the glucocorticoid receptor in atherosclerosis: a comparison. J Biochem Biophy Meth,2001,47:91.
  • 10Choy YS,Dabora SL, Hall F et al. Superiority of denaturing high performance liquid chromatography over single-stranded conformation and conformation-sensitive gel electrophoresis for mutation detection in TSC2.Ann Hum Genet,1999,63:383.

共引文献28

同被引文献7

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部