期刊文献+

湿润烧伤膏和皮维碘软膏治疗重度烧伤的观察 被引量:2

Evaluation of therapeutic effects of miost born ointment and betadine ointment in treatment of severe burn
原文传递
导出
摘要 为比较湿润烧伤膏和皮维碘软膏对重度烧伤的治疗效果,1991年7月至1995年6月对35例烧伤面积在30%以上的病人分别外用湿润烧伤膏和皮维碘软膏,结果表明:对浅Ⅱ度烧伤,两药的治疗结果无显著差异;对深度烧伤,湿润烧伤膏不如皮维碘软膏,前者抗菌能力差,愈合时间长,感染率、并发症发生率和死亡率均较高,也未见明显抑制瘢痕增生的作用。认为大面积深度烧伤病人应慎用湿润烧伤膏,尤其在气候炎热、潮湿的南方地区。 In order to compare' the therapeutic value of moist burn ointment (MBO) and betadine ointment in severe burns,the authors divided 30 patients with burn over 30% TBSA into two groups. In one group MBO was used, and in another group betadine was used. The result showed:①The difference between two groups was not great in superficial Ⅱ degree burn wound. ②MBO was less effective than betadine in deep burn wound. MBO had little antibacterial effect, wound healing was delayed, and inci- dences of infection, complication and mortality were higher. At the same time, MBO did not have no- ticeable effect in inhibiting scar hypertrophy. The authors suggust that MBO must be used with caution in severe burn patients, especially in the southern provinces where the climate is hot and humid.
出处 《中华整形烧伤外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 1996年第6期437-439,共3页
关键词 湿润烧伤膏 皮维碘软膏 烧伤 Miost Burn Ointment Betadine ointment Burn Infection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1蔡宝仁,中华整形烧伤外科杂志,1994年,10卷,24页
  • 2陈璧,中华整形烧伤外科杂志,1994年,10卷,19页
  • 3胡嘉念,中华整形烧伤外科杂志,1994年,10卷,23页
  • 4郑少瑜,汕头大学医学院学报,1993年,1卷,86页

同被引文献19

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部