期刊文献+

不同粘结剂对玻璃纤维桩固位力影响的研究 被引量:10

Effect of Luting Agents on the Retention of Glassfiber Post.
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:玻璃纤维桩以不同粘结材料粘固于根管内,测量并比较固位力的差别,为临床上选用合适的粘结材料提供参考。方法:将完整的已行根管治疗的离体人上中切牙30颗,分别于邻面釉牙骨质界水平截断,并机械预备根管,然后包埋在塑料柱内,随机分为3组,每组10个,用XL-50A型拉力试验机测量并记录桩脱位时所受的拉力。结果:3种粘结剂粘固同种大小桩时,粘结力相互间均有显著差别(P<0.05)。结论:不同粘结剂对玻璃纤维桩的固位力有显著性影响。 Objective: To test and compare the retention of glassfiber post cemented with three cements in order to provide a gnidline for clinical choose of luting cement. Methods: Thirty human maxillary middle incisors which had been completely filled were sectioned at the enamelo - eemental junction level and post - holes were prepared. All roots were embedded in the center of plastic eolum and divided into 3 groups randomly. The glassfiber post was cemented with three luting cements. Each sample was mounted on a tensile testing machine with crosshead speed of 110mm/min. Constant tensile force was applied until the post was dislodged. Results: When three cements cemented the same sized post, their retention were significant different ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : Different luting cements significantly affect the retention of glassfiber post.
出处 《口腔医学研究》 CAS CSCD 2007年第1期98-100,共3页 Journal of Oral Science Research
关键词 粘结剂 玻璃纤维桩 固位力 Cement Glassfiber post Retention
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1杜莲.国外医学:口腔医学分册,2004,31:142-144.
  • 2李群,王邦康,王春明,张振庭.上中切牙桩核冠修复的三维有限元研究[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2003,4(3):147-150. 被引量:18
  • 3Nissan J,Dmitry Y,Assif D.The use of rein forced conposite resin as corpensation for reduced post length[J].J Prosthet Dent,2001,86:304-308
  • 4常青,俞立英,吴斌,丁国强.三种牙本质粘接剂强度的体外测量与比较[J].上海口腔医学,2003,12(2):154-156. 被引量:6
  • 5Kanca Ⅲ.Resin bonding to wet substrate Ⅰ.Bonding to dentin[J].Quintessence Int,1992,23(1):39-41
  • 6Perdigao J,Van Meerbeek,Lopes MM,et al.The effect of a rewetting agent on dentin bonding[J].Dent Mater,1999,15(1):282-295

二级参考文献13

  • 1刘玉华,尹亚梅,宋世卿,李国珍.桩核修复体组织面设计的有限元分析[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1996,31(3):156-158. 被引量:59
  • 2哈尔滨建筑工程学院编.材料力学:1版[M].西安:高等教育出版社,1987.133.
  • 3Paulo EC,Roberto R,Marcela RO.Evaluation of micro-tensile,shear and tensile tests determining the bond strengh of three adhesive systems[J].Dent Mater,1998,14:394-398.
  • 4Della Bona A,Van Noort R.Shear vs tensile bond strength of resin composite bonded to ceramic[J].J Dent Res,1995,74:1591-1596.
  • 5Rueggeberg FA.Substrate for adhesion testing to tooth structure-Review of the literature[J].Dent Mater,1991,7:2-10.
  • 6Yoshiyama M,Sano H,Ebisu S,et al.Regional strengths of bonding agents to cervical sclerotic root dentin [J].J Dent Res,1996,75(6):1404-1413.
  • 7David H,Pashley DH,Sano H. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents:A review[J]. Dent Mater,1995,10:117-125.
  • 8Dunn WJ,Soderholm KJ.Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems[J].Am J Dent ,2001,14(5):297-303.
  • 9Fujishima A,Fujishima Y,Ferracane JL.Shear bond strength of four commercial bonding systems to CPTi[J].Dent Mater,1995,11(2):82-86.
  • 10Sugaya T,Kawanami M,Noguehi H.Periodontal healing after bonding treatment of vertical root fracture[J].Dent Traumatol ,2001,17:174-179.

共引文献22

同被引文献97

引证文献10

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部