摘要
嵇康与海德格尔都追问生存可能性问题。嵇康以心(道)为本体概念,又把它作为价值真源,可能性论题以此视域得以展开。海德格尔的存在概念只具本体论含义,生存可能性的价值向度要由死这一概念来引导。二人体系不同,但都指向生存的可能性领域。
Ji Kang and Heidegger both made detailed inquiries into existential possibility. Ji Kang regarded Heart (Tao) as a noumenon and as a source of value, by which the discussion of possibility was waged. Heidegger's concept of Being was only related to ontology and the direction of value about existential possibility was led by the concept of death. Systems of both thoughts were different, but both pointed to the field of existential possibility.
出处
《河北大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第1期50-54,共5页
Journal of Hebei University(Philosophy and Social Science)
关键词
心
死
存在
可能性
heart, death, being, possibility