期刊文献+

乳腺癌术前化疗临床疗效与病理反应的关系

Relationship between clinical therapeutic effectiveness and pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解乳腺癌术前化疗疗效与病理反应的关系。方法对52例Ⅱ-Ⅲ期女性乳癌行术前化疗的患者进行临床化疗疗效和病理反应的评定,并统计两者的符合情况。结果术前化疗的临床有效率为61.5%(32/52),病理反应率为67.3%(35/52)。两者之间符合率为59.6%(31/52),无明显相关性(P〉0.05)。Kappa值为0.12(小于0.40),两者间不一致。结论乳腺癌术前化疗临床疗效与病理反应不一致。乳腺癌术前化疗的临床疗效对临床的指导意义,如何提高病理反应率有待进一步进行探讨。 Objective To find out the relationship between clinical therapeutic effectiveness and pathological response to preoperative chemotherapy in breast cancer. Methods Clinical therapeutic effectiveness and pathological response were assessed to judge the degree of tumor reduction after preoperative chemotherapy in 52 patients with phase- Ⅱ to Ⅲbreast cancer, Statistical means was used to analyze if they were in accord with each other. Results The rate of clinical remission after preoperative chemotherapy was 61.5% (32/52) and the rate of pathological response was 67.3% (35/52). The rate of accordance was 59.6% (31/52). They were not correlated(P 〉0.05). Kappa value was 0. 12 (〈0.40) and they were not consistent with each other. Conclusions Clinical response and pathological response in preoperative chemotherapy patients were not in accord with each other. It is suggested that the value of clinical therapeutic effectiveness in preoperative chemotherapy patients for guiding clinical practice and how to improve the rate of pathological response should be explored further.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2007年第1期17-19,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 乳腺肿瘤/化学疗法 临床疗效 病理反应 Breast neoplasms/chemotherapy Clinical therapeutic effectiveness Pathological response
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Valero V, Buzdar AU, MeNeese M, et al. Primary chemotherapy in the treatment of breast cancer:the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience [ J ]. Clin Breast Cancer,2002,3(2) :S63-68.
  • 2Insa A, ChiriveUa I, Lluch A. Neoadjuvant therapy for operable breast-cancer[J]. Med Clin (Bare), 2006,126(8):295-303.
  • 3Rajah R, Esteva FJ, Symmans WF. Pathologic changes in breast cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy: implications for the assessment of response [ J ]. Clin Breast Cancer,2004,5 (3) :235-238.
  • 4Feldman L, Hortobagy G, Buzdar A, et al. Pathological assessment of response to induction chemotherapy in breast cancer[J].Cancer Res,1986,46(5) :2578-2581.
  • 5Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer[ J]. J Clin Oncol, 1998,16:2672-2685.
  • 6Valentina G, Kristine B, Shu-Wan K, et al. Prognostic value of pathologic complete response after primary chemotherapy in relation to hormone receptor status and other factors [ J ]. J Clin Oncol,2006,24 (7) :1037-1044.
  • 7Kuerer HM, Newnum LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxombicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy[ J]. J Clin Oncol,1999,17(2) :460-469.
  • 8Kaufmarm M, yon Minckwitz G, Rody A. Preoperative ( neoadjurant) systemic treatment of breast cancer[ J]. Breast,2005,14(6) :576-581.
  • 9Romieu G, Tubiana-Hulin M, Fumolean P, et al. A multicenter randomized phase II study of 4 or 6 cycles of adriamycin/Taxol(paclitaxel) (AT) as neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer(BC) [J]. Ann Oncol,2002,13 (5) :33.
  • 10Green M, Buzdar A, Smith T, et al. Weekly (wkly) paclitaxel(P) followed by FAC as primary systemic chemotherapy (PSC)of operable breast cancer improves pathologic complete remission(pCR) rates when compared to every 3-week (Q 3 wk) P therapy (tx) followed by FAC- final results of a prospective phase Ⅲ randomized trial[J]. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol,2002,21:35a.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部