期刊文献+

上海股票市场收益率与成交量因果关系研究 被引量:4

A Research of the Causality between Return Rate and Trading Volume in Shanghai Stock Market
下载PDF
导出
摘要 线性因果关系检验结果表明,在股市得到快速发展和市场交易制度改善后,我国股市量价因果关系阶段性异质特征明显,我国股票市场量价关系从因果关系不显著发展为具有双向因果关系。同时,非线性因果关系检验也得到类似的结论,不同之处在于在取消涨跌停板制度后的第二阶段,虽然不存在交易量对收益的线性因果关系,但存在非线性格兰杰因果关系。所有检验结果表明我国股市在交易制度转变后,市场结构也同时发生了根本变化。 The linear Granger causality tests show that after the quick development and the perfection of trading system the momentary heterogeneity characteristic of the causality between volume and price in the stock market of our country is very obvious ;the relationship between volume and price in the stock market of our country developed from unobvious causalty to double - direction causalty. At the same time non - linear causality tests reach similar conclusion. The difference lies in that in the second stage after the rise and fall limit was cancelled non - linear Granger causalty exists though linear causalty between trading volume and return doesn't exist, All the test results show that after the change in trading system fundamental changes have taken place in the market structure of the stock market of Our country.
作者 陈灿平 刘武
出处 《经济经纬》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期140-143,共4页 Economic Survey
关键词 上海股票市场 收益率 交易量 交易制度 格兰杰因果关系 Shanghai stock market rate of return trading volume trading system Granger causality
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Baek E, Brock W, (1992), A general test for nonlinear Granger causality: Bivariate model [ R ]. Iowa State University of Wisconsin, Madison.
  • 2Blume I E. Easley, (1994), Hara. Market statistics and technical analysis: the role of volume [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 49(1): 153- 182.
  • 3Brock, W. A, D. A. Hsieh and B. LeBaron, (1991), Nonlinear Dynamics, and Instability, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • 4Copeland, T. E, (1976), a Model of Asset Trading under the Assumption of Sequential Information Arrival, Journal of Finance, 31, 1149 - 1168.
  • 5Campbell, J, S. Grossman and J. Wang, (1993),Trading Volume and Serial Correlation in Stock Returns,Quarterly Journal of Economies, 108,905 -939.
  • 6Ying, C. C, (1966), Stock Market Prices and Volume of Sales, Econometric, 34,676 - 686.
  • 7陈良东.上海股市价量关系的实证分析[J].上海财经大学学报,2000,2(3):37-41. 被引量:17
  • 8陈东明.台股市场价量关系之实证研究[D].台湾大学商学研究所硕士论文,1991.
  • 9陈永茂.台湾证券市场股票价格与成交量关系之实证研究[D].台湾科技大学企业管理技术研究所企业管理学程硕士论文,1993.
  • 10况欢,李惠敏,曾盛敏.反身性理论与股市价格运动趋势[J].西南民族学院学报(哲学社会科学版),2004,25(9):95-98. 被引量:5

二级参考文献31

  • 1上海交通大学证券金融研究所-国泰君安证券研究所联合课题组.上海股票市场日内流动性与波动性研究[N].上海证券报,2001-08-13(8).
  • 2[1]Cornell B. The relation between volume and price variability in futures markets[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 1981,1:303-316.
  • 3[2]Grammatikos T, Saunders A. Futures price variability: a test of maturity and volume effects[J]. Journal of Business, 1986,59:319-330.
  • 4[3]Karpoff J M. The relationship between price changes and trading volume: a survey[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1987,22:109-126.
  • 5[4]McCarthy J, Najand M. State space modeling of price and volume dependence: evidence from currency futures[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 1993,13:335-344.
  • 6[5]Foster A J. Volume-volatility relation for crude oil futures markets[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 1995,15:929-951.
  • 7[6]Bessembinder H, Seguin P J. Price volatility, trading volume, and market depth:evidence from futures market[J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 1993,28:21-39.
  • 8[7]Shalen C. Volume, volatility, and dispersion of beliefs[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1993,6:405-434.
  • 9[8]Girma P B, Mougoue M. An empirical examination of the relation between futures spreads volatility, volume, and open interest[J]. Journal of Futures Markets, 2002,22:1083-1102.
  • 10[10]Gallant A R, Rossi P, Tauchen G. Stock prices and volume[J]. Review of Financial Studies, 1992, 5:199-242.

共引文献146

同被引文献43

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部