期刊文献+

临床护理用吞咽功能评估工具的信效度研究 被引量:68

Reliability and validity of clinical nursing swallowing assessment tool
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对临床护理用吞咽功能评估工具(ClinicalNursingSwallowingAssessmentTool,CNSAT)进行测量学检验。方法使用CNSAT对90例急性期和慢性期脑血管病患者的吞咽功能进行评估,根据评估结果检验该工具的信度和效度,同时初步确定参考判断临界值。结果临床护理用吞咽功能评估工具评定者信度良好,与康复中心治疗师对患者吞咽功能的评估得分差异无显著意义;同质性信度也较好,Cronbach′sα=0.8890。CNSAT可初步判断脑血管病患者有无吞咽障碍,显示其有较好的区分效度。同时与才藤荣一吞咽障碍7级评价法有较好的相关性(r=-0.878),提示其具有较好的效标关联效度。将CNSAT得分4分定为吞咽障碍可疑,6分设定为初步判断吞咽障碍的临界值。结论CNSAT是一种简单、方便、安全的评估工具,其信度和效度较好,适合临床护理工作者评估脑血管病患者的吞咽功能,并能初步筛选出存在吞咽障碍的患者。
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2007年第2期127-130,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
关键词 脑血管意外 吞咽障碍 临床护理研究 评估工具 Cerebrovascular accident Deglutition disorders Clinical nursing research
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1王拥军.卒中单元[M].北京:科学技术文献出版,2003.1-2.
  • 2Ramsey DJ. Smithard DG, Kalra L. Early assessments of dysphagia and aspiration risk in acute stroke patients. Stroke. 2003.34:1252-1257.
  • 3Broadley S, Croser D, Cottrell J,et al. Predictors of prolonged dysphagia following acute stroke. Journal of clinical neuroscience, 2003,10 (3) : 300-305.
  • 4Finestone HM,Fisher J. Sudden death in the dysphasic stroke patient-a case of airway obstruction caused by a food bolus: A brief report. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1998,77 (6) : 550-552.
  • 5Dziewas R, Ritter M,Schilling M, et al. Pneumonia in acute stroke patients fed by nasogastric tube. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 2004,75(6):852-856.
  • 6Giselle M, Grad DP. Swallowing function after stroke prognosis and prognostic factors at 6 months. Stroke,1999,30:744-748.
  • 7Kedlaya D, Brandstater ME. Swallowing. nutrition and hydration during acute stroke care. Top Stroke Rehabilitation,2002,9(2):23-38.
  • 8高怀民.脑卒中吞咽障碍的症状检查和评估[J].中国临床康复,2002,6(13):1874-1875. 被引量:25
  • 9Depippo KL, Holas MA. The Burke Dysphagia Screening Test: Validation of its use in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 1994,75:1284-1286.
  • 10Smithard DG, O'Neill PA, Park C,et al. Can bedside assessment reliably exclude aspiration following acute stroke. Age Aging, 1998,27:99-106.

二级参考文献8

  • 1SEYMOUR DG,BALL AE,RUSSELL EM,et al. Problems in using health survey questionnaires in older patients with physical disabilities.The reliability and validity of the SF-36 and the effect of cognitive impairment[J].J Eval Clin Pract,2001,7(4):411.
  • 2HOBART JC,LAMPING DL,FREEMAN JA,et al. Evidence based measurement:which disability scale for neurologic rehabilitation[J].Neurology,2001,57(4):639.
  • 3KUCUKDEVECI AA,YAVUZER G,ELHAN AH,et al. Adaptation of the Functional Independence Measure for use in Turkey[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):311.
  • 4DAVING Y,ANDREN E,NORDHOLM L,et al. Reliability of an interview approach to the Functional Independence Measure[J].Clin Rehabil,2001,15(3):301.
  • 5COHEN ME,MARINO RJ. The tools of disability outcomes research functional status measures[J].Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2000,81(12):21.
  • 6SCHINDL MR,FORSTNER C,KERN H,et al. Evaluation of a German version of the Rivermead Mobility Index (RMI) in acute and chronic stroke patients[J].Eur J Neurol,2000,7(5):523.
  • 7冯定香,李胜利.吞咽障碍的康复评定与治疗[J].中国康复,1997,12(3):137-138. 被引量:14
  • 8刘锟.吞咽和咽食管段运动功能障碍的研究进展[J].中国胸心血管外科临床杂志,2000,7(3):191-193. 被引量:8

共引文献548

同被引文献781

引证文献68

二级引证文献703

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部