摘要
目的:探讨深部脓肿切开引流术后用湿润烧伤膏换药的疗效及机制。方法:将62例深部脓肿切开引流术后患者随机分成两组,比较两组分别用湿润烧伤膏纱条换药和凡士林纱条换药的疗效。结果:湿润烧伤膏组平均治愈时间9.5±2.7d,凡士林组平均治愈时间12.2±3.6d,两者比较有显著差异(P<0.01)。结论:湿润烧伤膏纱条用于深部脓肿切开引流,术后换药效果好、疗程短,为目前首选药物。
Objective: To investigate the efficacy of MEBO gauze in the treatment of wounds after incision and drainage of deep abscess. Method: 62 patients with wounds after incision and drainage of deep abscess were divided into 2 groups. Patients in one group were treated with MEBO gauze and in the other group treated with Vaseline gauze. A comparison of the efficacy of the 2 groups was made. Result: In MEBO group, the average wound healing time was 9.5 ± 2. 7 days and in Vaseline group 12. 2 ±3.6 days. The difference between the 2 groups was very significant ( P 〈0. 01 ). Conclusion : MEBO gauze is very efficacious in treating wounds after incision and drainage of deep abscess. The treating course is short. It is the drug of first choice.
出处
《中国烧伤创疡杂志》
2007年第1期41-42,共2页
The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers