企业本质:技术、权威、合约——以对企业家团队内部联接的理论分析为例

The Nature of the Enterprise:Technology,Authority and Contract

问题导向的一致性决定马克思企业理论与西方主流企业理论之间总体具有异同性质。这种理论异同性质从“科斯难题”的破题入手,旨在申明:企业家团队的内部联结本质是企业本质的进一步发展;狭义视阈的技术和权威的企业分析框架应被进一步推进到广义视阈的技术、权威、合约的企业分析框架。立足于“联结本质”的历史演进的演绎和分析,从而确实可以增进企业本质的认识逻辑链条。

The consistency in settling common issues determines the character of co-existence of similarities and differences between Marxist enterprise theory and the Western mainst^am firm theories. This theoretical character can explain ＂Coase puzzle＂ by demonstrating that the nature of the adherence within the team of entrepreneurs is a further development of the nature of the firm, and the analytical framework of enterprise from that of technology and authority in a narrow sense should be advanced to that of technology, authority and contract in a broad sense. An approach to the nature of adherence based on the perspective of historical evolution will play an important role in the process of cognizing the nature of enterprise and grasping its logical chains.