摘要
This paper discusses Paul Ricoeur and Emmanuel Levinas’attitude towards ontology. On the one hand, that Ricoeur revised the conventional ontology means that he not only has replaced the question of “it is” pursued by conventional ontology, with the phenomenological descriptions and the hermeneutical analyses of the question “both it is and it not is” formally, but also renovated this kind of ontology in content. On the other hand, starting from his typical reading of ontology, Levinas has proved the preferential and important meaning for his “the ethics for others” and its superiority to ontology, and the important significance for philosophy. Accordingly, the revision and transcendence to ontology is a strong current in contemporary French philosophy. This paper tries to affirm the meaning and value of the trend.
This paper discusses Paul Ricoeur and Emmanuel Levinas’attitude towards ontology. On the one hand, that Ricoeur revised the conventional ontology means that he not only has replaced the question of “it is” pursued by conventional ontology, with the phenomenological descriptions and the hermeneutical analyses of the question “both it is and it not is” formally, but also renovated this kind of ontology in content. On the other hand, starting from his typical reading of ontology, Levinas has proved the preferential and important meaning for his “the ethics for others” and its superiority to ontology, and the important significance for philosophy. Accordingly, the revision and transcendence to ontology is a strong current in contemporary French philosophy. This paper tries to affirm the meaning and value of the trend.
出处
《哲学研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2007年第2期72-77,共6页
Philosophical Research
基金
甘肃省社科基金项目"西方技术文化和后现代哲学的反思"(编号WZ03000)研究成果
