期刊文献+

语言不完备性:明达语言与语言自救——语言哲学系列研究(二) 被引量:14

Imperfection of Language: Metalanguage and Self-rescue by Language Itself
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文探讨语言的不完备性,批判性地回顾部分哲学家对语言不完备性的拯救方法。在此基础上,根据黑格尔的辩证法思想提出语言自救的观点认为语言的不完备性因由语言自身的明达语言维度得以拯救。语言的不完备性和明达语言维度是一对矛盾,正是这一矛盾的辩证发展促使语言不断发展、丰富和完善,使语言成为如其所是的语言。由此,我们认为,语言的不完备性是语言自身不可分割的本质属性。如果像分析哲学家们那样将之用理想语言取代和其他分析方法治疗,就会抽掉语言的本真特质,语言也就不存在了。 This paper first discusses the imperfection of language and reviews some philosophers' approaches to remedy it. Then we put forward the view that language, owing to its metalanguage (ML, hence) dimension, rescues itself from the imperfection, the process of which follows a Hegelian dialectics : The ML dimension of language and language' s imperfection form a contradictory pair of thesis and antithesis. It is this pair' s dialectical development that drives language to get developed and enriched into the state as it is ( i. e. , synthesis in Hegelian terminology). Thus we argue that the imperfection of language is an inseparable property of language and any attempt at removing it or curing it will take away the true nature of language as well as the language itself.
作者 王爱华
机构地区 电子科技大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期19-28,共10页 Foreign Language Research
基金 "(西)语言哲学与现代语言研究"(教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地2005年度重大研究项目 项目批准号:05JJD740178 课题组负责人:广东外语外贸大学外国语言学及应用语言学研究中心钱冠连)的研究性成果之一。
关键词 语言不完备性 明达语言 明达语言维度 语言自救 Hegel辩证法 the imperfection of language, metalanguage, the metalanguage dimension, self-rescue of language, Hegelian dialectics.
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

二级参考文献28

  • 1钱冠连.论工具性语言扩展式——西方语言哲学研究之八[J].语言科学,2003,2(3):23-33. 被引量:9
  • 2李子荣.逻辑元语言问题[J].南通纺织职业技术学院学报,2005,5(2):32-36. 被引量:3
  • 3Bickerton, D. (1995) Language and human behavior[M]. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
  • 4Caffi, C. (1994) Metapragnmtics [A]. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics [C].(pp. 2461-2d65). Oxford: Pergamon.
  • 5Carnap, R. (1937/2001) The Logical Syntax of Language[M]. London: Routledge 11 New Petter lame.
  • 6Carnap, R. (1959) Introduction to Semantics and Formalization of Logic (Vol. I, II) [M]. Cambridge/Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
  • 7Davidson, D. (1984) Inquiries into truth and interpretation[M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 8Frege, G. (1999) On Sense and Reference [A]. In M. Baghramian (Ed.), Modem Philosophy of Language[C]. (pp. 6-25). Washington: Counterpoint.
  • 9Haiinan, J. (1998) Talk is cheap : sarcasm, alienation and the evolution of language[M]. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.
  • 10Hu, z. (2001) Linguistics: A Cottrse Book (2 ed.)[M]. Beijing: Peking University.

共引文献31

同被引文献147

引证文献14

二级引证文献73

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部