期刊文献+

从发生学角度看语用学 被引量:1

Pragmatics from the Perspective of Genetics
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章从语用学的产生、发展角度,将后期维特根斯坦的“意义即使用”等、奥斯汀和塞尔的言语行为理论、格赖斯的会话含义理论与合作原则,以及威尔森与斯波伯的关联理论置于分析性语言哲学语境中,梳理语用学发展的基本路径,进一步剖析语用学目前所面临困境的原因。在此基础上指出,德国学者尤尔根·哈贝马斯以主体间性、文化间性为特征的交往行为理论或许是走出现有困境的有效途径。 The essay puts those theories such as meaning is in use by the later Wittgenstein, etc ; speech act theory by Austin and Searle; the Gricean conversational implicature and the co-operative principle; relevance theory by Sperber and Wilson in the context of an analytic philosophy of language from the perspective of the origin and development of pragmatics, expounding the basic route of pragmatic development and further analyzing the causes of encountering the dilemma nowadays. On an account of this, the the- ory of communicative action featuring inter-subjectivity and inter-culture by the German scholar Habermas is presumably supposed to be an effective way of leading pragmatics out of the current dilemma.
作者 管音频
机构地区 台州学院
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第1期99-103,共5页 Foreign Language Research
关键词 语用学 困境 批判 交往行为理论 pragmatics crisis criticism the theory of Communicative Action
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

同被引文献9

  • 1姜望琪.关联理论质疑[J].外语研究,2001,18(4):26-31. 被引量:23
  • 2DeidreWilson,冉永平.关联与交际[J].现代外语,2000(2):210-217. 被引量:67
  • 3[1]威尔逊和斯珀珀使用的例子原文:he most important type of cognitive effect achieved by processing an input in a context is a CONTEXTUAL IMPLICATION,a conclusion deducible from the input and the context together,but from neither input nor context alone.For example,on seeing my train arriving,I might look at my watch,access my knowledge of the train timetable,and derive the contextual implication that my train is late (which may itself achieve relevance by combining with further contextual assumptions to yield further implications).Other types of cognitive effect include the strengthening,revision or abandonment of available assumptions.For example,the sight of my train arriving late might confirm my impression that the service is deteriorating,or make me alter my plans to do some shopping on the way to work.According to relevance theory,an input is RELEVANT to all individual when,and only when,its processing yields such positive cognitive effects." (Wilson,D.& D.Sperber.2004:608)
  • 4[3]何自然,冉永平.《关联性:交际与认知》导读[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2001.
  • 5[5]Levinson,S.C.A review of Relevance[J].Journal of Linguistics.1989(25):455-472.
  • 6[6][11][12][13][14][15] Sperber,D.and D.Wilson.Relevance:Communication and Cognition[M].Oxford:Blackwell.1995:109,286 note 25,108,107,139,286 note 25.
  • 7[7]Sperber,D.and D.Wilson.Pragmatics.In:Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language[M].Eds.F.Jackson and M.Smith.Oxford:Oxford University Press.2005:468-501.
  • 8[9]Wilson,D.and Sperber,D.Truthfulness and relevance[J].Mind.2002(111):583-632.
  • 9[10]Wilson,D.and D.Sperber.Relevance theory.In:Handbook of Pragmatics[M].Eds.G.Ward and L.Horn.Oxford:Blackwell.2004:607-632.

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部