期刊文献+

杜克健康问卷信度和效度的初步研究 被引量:2

A study of reliability and validity of Duke Health Profile(THE DUKE) in outpatient service of psychology
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:研究杜克健康问卷(Duke Health Profile,THE DUKE)对心理咨询门诊病人初步应用的信度和效度。方法:以上海精神卫生中心心理咨询门诊的病人为研究对象,由专业护士指导自评。信度评定用C ronbachα值表示量表的内部一致性,复测信度评定间隔两周;用自测健康评定量表(SRHMS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)作为效标测验平行效度。结果:THE DUKE总体α值0.66;躯体、心理、社会、焦虑和抑郁各分量表的α值分别为0.61、0.52、0.25、0.51和0.60;THE DUKE的躯体、心理、社会、焦虑和抑郁与健康自测问卷中生理、心理、社会及SAS、SDS的相关系数分别是0.332、0.548、0.277、-0.395、-0.562(P<0.01)。结论:THE DUKE对心理咨询门诊病人有良好的信度和效度,简单实用有进一步研究和推广的价值。 Objective:To investigate the reliability and validity of Duke Health Profile (THE DUKE) in outpatient service of psychology. Methods:217 cases were involved in this study, the coefficient of inter - item consistency (Cronbachct) of THE DUKE and its subscales, test - retest reliability were assessed, and the criterion - related validity of THE DUKE was assessed with self - report health measure scale, self - report anxiety scale and self - report depression scale respectively too. Results: The Cronbachctof THE DUKE is 0.66, and of the subscales of physical, mental, social, anxiety and depression are 0. 61,0. 52,0. 25,0. 51and0. 60 respectively. The criterion - related validity is 0.332, 0.548, 0. 277, - 0. 395and - 0. 562 respectively. Conclusions: The reliability and validity of Duke Health Profile is well, and, to be a self- report scale for health screening, it is simple and worthy of being used widely.
出处 《中国民康医学》 2007年第5期193-194,197,共3页 Medical Journal of Chinese People’s Health
关键词 杜克健康问卷 信度 效度 心理咨询门诊病人 Duke health profile Reliability Validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. Development of the 17- item Duke Health Profile [ J ]. Faro Pract, 1991,8 : 396 - 401.
  • 2Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. The Duke Health Profile. A 17 -item measure of health and dysfunction[J]. Med Care, 1990,28 : 1056 - 1072.
  • 3Parkerson GR Jr, Broadhead WE, Tse CK. Health status and severity of illness as predictors of outcomes in primary care[ J]. Med Care, 1995,33:53 - 66.
  • 4Guillemin F, Paul - Dauphin A, Virion JM, et al. The DUKE health profile: a generic instrument to measure the quality of life tied to health [ J ]. Sante Publique, 1997,9:35 - 44.
  • 5汪向东 王希林 骊弘.心理卫生评定量表手册(增订版)[M].北京:中国心理卫生杂志社,1999.220-223.
  • 6Parkerson GR Jr, Willke RJ, Hays RD. An international comparison of the reliability and responsiveness of the Duke Health Profile for measuring health - related quality of life of patients treated with alprostadil for erectile dysfunction[ J]. Med Care, 1999,37:56 -67.

共引文献1910

同被引文献19

  • 1冯正直,张大均.中学生抑郁症状的流行病学特征研究[J].中国行为医学科学,2005,14(2):103-105. 被引量:116
  • 2王爱民.耳穴注射联合微波、心理治疗突发性耳聋的疗效观察[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(3):259-260. 被引量:5
  • 3王玲.高校学生突发性耳聋发病前后心理分析及护理措施[J].中国初级卫生保健,2007,21(5):76-77. 被引量:7
  • 4中华医学会耳鼻咽喉科学会.突发性耳聋诊断依据和疗效分级[J].中华耳鼻咽喉科杂志,1997,32:72-72.
  • 5American Psyehiation Association. Diagnosis and statistic manual of mental disorders. 4th edition( DSM-IV ). Washington DC :American Pschiatric Association, 1994. 424-429.
  • 6Zung WWK. The Differentiation of Anxiety and Depressive Disorders:A Biometric Approach. Psychosomatics, 1971, 12 : 380-384.
  • 7沈渔邨主编.精神病学.第1版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1994.56-57.
  • 8PARKERSON GR Jr, BROADHEAD WE, TSE CK. Health status and severity of illness as predictors of outcomes in primary care. Med Care, 1995,33 ( 1 ) :53 - 66.
  • 9NOVELLA J, ANKRI J, MORRONE I, et al. Evaluation of the quality of life in dementia with a genetic quality of life questionnaire:The Duke Health Profile. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord, 2001,12 ( 2 ) : 156 - 166.
  • 10PERRET-GUILLAUME C, BRIANCON S, GUILLEMIN F, et al. Which generic health related quality of life questionnaire should be used in older inparients: Comparison of the duke health profile and the MOS Short-Form SF- 36? J Nutr Health Aging,2010,14 (4) :325 - 331.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部