美式投资条约的新近发展对中国的启示被引量：2

下载PDF

导出

摘要进入21世纪,美国将双边投资条约和自由贸易协定中的投资规则逐步协调一致,并在NAFTA第11章投资争端仲裁实践的基础上,对投资规则进行了一定修正,防止投资争端仲裁机制造成对国家主权的过度侵蚀。近年来,中国对外签订的双边投资条约中几乎都包含了投资争端仲裁条款,在缺乏实践经验的情况下,美式投资条约争端仲裁条款的新发展很值得我们研究,并应在时机成熟时加以借鉴。

作者梁丹妮

机构地区中山大学法学院

出处《云南社会科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2007年第2期82-86,共5页 Social Sciences in Yunnan

关键词北美自由贸易协定双边投资条约投资争端仲裁国家主权

分类号 F830.59 [经济管理—金融学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1J.C. Thomas. Reflections on NAFTA 1105 of NAFTA: History,State Practice and the Influence of Commentators [J]. ICSID Rev.-FILJ 2002, (17).
2Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions of the NAFTA Free Trade Commission of July 31, 2001.
3余劲松.外资的公平与公正待遇问题研究——由NAFTA的实践产生的几点思考[J].法商研究,2005,22(6):41-48. 被引量：39
4Chile-U.S. FTA.
5Office of the U.S. Trade Representative. NAFTA Commission Announces New Transparency Measures (Oct. 7, 2003), http://www.ustr.gov/Document Library/Press Releases/2003/October/NAFTA Commission Announces New Transparency Measures.Html (last visited: March 17, 2006).
6Office of the U.S. Trade Representative, FTC Joint Statement:A Decade of Achievement (July 16, 2004), http://www.ustr.gov/Document Library/Press Releases/2004/July/NAFTA Free Trade Commission Joint Statement - A Decade of Achievement.html. (last visited: March 15, 2006).
7Andrea J. Menaker. Benefiting From Experience: Developments in the United States' Most Recent Investment Agreements [J]. U.C.Davis J. Int'l L. & Polly, 2005,(12).
8Methanex Corp. v. United States of America, Final Award of the Tribunal on Jurisdiction and Merits (Aug. 3, 2005), http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/51052.pdf.
9中华人民共和国最高人民法院.关于执行我国加入《承认和执行外国仲裁裁决公约》的通知.中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报,1987,(2).

二级参考文献13

1See Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. The Government of Canada, http://wol, international, gc. ca/minpub/Publication, asp? publication_id=37831 &Language= E.
2See S.D. Myers, Inc. v. Canada, 40 I. L.M. 1408, 1437 (NAFTA Arb. Trib. Nov. 13, 2000).
3See Metalclad Corp. v. United Mexican States, 40 I. L. M. 36 (2001).
4See NAFTA Free Trade Commission, Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions 2 (2001) clarifying that article 1105 embodies the customary international law standard for determining possible violations of "fair and equitable treatment" and "full protection and security", see httpt//WWW, naftaclaims, com/Papers/July%2031%202001%20NAFTA%20FTC%20Statement. pdf.
5See David A. Gantz, The Evolution of FTA Investment Provisions: From NAFTA to the United States - Chile Free Trade Agreement, 19 Am. U. Int'l L. Rev. 679, 715 (2004).
6A. Roth,The Minium Standard of International Law Applied to Aliens(1949),p. 99.
7See R. Lillich, Duties of States Regarding Civil Rights of Aliens, Recueil des Cours (1978) ,p. 350.
8See J. H. W. Verzvjl, International Law in Historical Perspective(1972) ,p. 438.
9See Mondev v. United States, 42 I. L. M. 85 (2003).
10See ADF Group, Inc. v. United States, paras. 44-45 (ICSID Jan. 9,2003), http://WWW, worldbank, org/iesid/eases/ADF-a-ward. pdf.